Trying to write in LaTex and MathJax not picking up

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter giodude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Mathjax
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around issues related to using LaTeX in the Physics Forums, specifically regarding the rendering of LaTeX in posts and previews. Participants share their experiences and suggest potential workarounds for the problems encountered.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports difficulty with LaTeX not rendering correctly in the preview mode, remaining in plain text.
  • Another participant mentions that reloading the page resolved their issue, suggesting a possible temporary fix.
  • A participant explains that the parser for LaTeX does not load on page updates, which affects rendering in new posts and replies unless LaTeX is already present on the page.
  • Concerns are raised about a more severe bug where inline LaTeX becomes garbled text after clicking Preview or Post Thread, losing the source code.
  • Links to threads reporting similar issues and potential workarounds are provided by participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying experiences with the LaTeX rendering issue, and while some suggest solutions, there is no consensus on a definitive fix. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to handle LaTeX in posts.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependency on the presence of LaTeX for rendering to occur, and the issues with the new thread editor not supporting LaTeX properly. The discussion highlights the need for further clarification on the rendering process and potential bugs.

giodude
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
I'm attempting to use latex to write a question in the physics forum. However, when I click preview to check if the formatting is correct it doesn't reformat to display in its latex form, rather it stays in plain text. Any suggestions on what I may be doing wrong?

I've posted the screenshots of before and after clicking preview below.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-10-03 at 9.17.26 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-10-03 at 9.17.26 PM.png
    12.3 KB · Views: 106
  • Screen Shot 2023-10-03 at 9.17.38 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-10-03 at 9.17.38 PM.png
    11.9 KB · Views: 153
Physics news on Phys.org
Reloaded the page and seems to have been fixed now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
It's a known bug that seems to be hard to fix.

The parser doesn't load on a page update (like when you reply to a thread), only on the initial load. So if there isn't already LaTeX on a page it doesn't render in a new post. Refresh the page to render.

Likewise, it doesn't work in reply preview unless there's already LaTeX. You can fix this by writing some LaTeX, going into preview, and then refreshing (it's a good idea to take a copy of your text first, just in case...).

LaTeX doesn't work at all in the new thread editor. My advice is to compose an opening post in the reply box of a thread with LaTeX, then paste it into the new thread start when you're happy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb, berkeman and giodude
The bug is actually worse than LaTeX not rendering. After writing some LaTeX, when you refresh the page, inline LaTeX will be rendered in the text editor itself. The moment you click Preview or Post Thread, the rendered LaTeX will be transformed into garbled text. You won't have the source code anymore.

A list of threads reporting the same issue is available here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...equation-rendering-issue.1046932/post-6816969

A workaround is mentioned here: https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...iew-on-this-forum-please.1050518/post-6862199
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K