Turbochargers, what's the diffrence between the turbine and compressor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between the turbine and compressor components of a typical automotive fixed geometry turbocharger. Participants explore the reasons for size discrepancies, operational principles, and the feasibility of using a turbine as a compressor.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the compressor is generally larger than the turbine despite the turbine handling more mass flow, questioning the reasons behind this observation.
  • Another participant explains that gas speed affects the design of the compressor and turbine, highlighting differences in how gas speed and metal speed relate to the performance of each component.
  • It is mentioned that hot exhaust gas can achieve higher speeds than cold intake air, which may contribute to the size differences between the compressor and turbine.
  • A participant suggests that some turbines have curved blades and questions whether a turbine could be run in reverse to function as a compressor, considering a practical application for recycling a turbocharger.
  • In response, another participant asserts that turbines and compressors are designed for fundamentally different purposes, emphasizing that they are not interchangeable and that blade design parameters are critical.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interchangeability of turbine and compressor functions, with some suggesting potential applications while others firmly reject the idea, indicating a lack of consensus on this point.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various design considerations, such as blade curvature and material properties, which may influence performance but do not reach a resolution on the implications of these factors.

James125
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I'm new to the forum. I'm an engineer...admittedly perhaps not a great one.

I wanted to know about a typical automotive fixed geometry turbocharger. Generally it seems that the compressor is larger than the turbine. Despite being more mass flow on the turbine side. :confused: Why exactly is this?

Also another part to my question - If you used the turbine as a compressor for atmospheric air, what would it's flow and pressure be like? Would it be very inefficient?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi James125!

Some photographs show a larger compressors, others not - comparison not obvious.

Gas speed determines the tip speed of the wheels, not the (marginally different) mass flow. On a centrifugal compressor, gas speed is a bit lower than metal speed, with the blades curved backwards, in order to stabilize the throughput: more flow means less pressure. But on all turbine designs I've seen for turbochargers, gas speed equals metal speed, with blade tips straight. That would be one reason for larger compressors wheels.

More reasons make the comparison difficult.
- Hot exhaust gas gets more easily speed than cold intake air (that's why a gas turbine works).
- The exhaust gas can expand further within the turbine wheel, not just upstream of it.
- The width of the wheels can differ, not just the diameter.

Use the turbine as a compressor: not so good...
- The straight blades give no stability to the mass flow.
- The outlet is a bad intake, with wrong diameter and blade curve
- The turbine's high-temperature material is more expensive!
It's more a question of optimization, but turbomachines need optimization to work.
 
A very informative answer. I have observed that some turbines do have curved blades. If this is the case could the turbine be ran in reverse? So the outlet is the inlet and the blades spin in the opposite direction.

I ask because I am thinking of recycling a turbocharger and using the turbine impeller as a compressor, as I think the compressor impeller is too large for my application.
 
No. A turbine is designed to lower the energy of the air. A compressor increases it.
They are designed for two different things and are not interchangeable.

Just having a "curved blade" is meaningless.
There are critical parameters associated with the twist of the blade, as well as with everything else inside of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K