How does the Twin Paradox demonstrate the effects of general relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PatrickPowers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Twin paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Twin Paradox illustrates the effects of general relativity through the use of the equivalence principle, as explained by Professor Daniel F. Styer. In an accelerating spaceship with two clocks, one at the tail (Clock T) and one at the nose (Clock N), the clocks experience different time intervals due to their separation. Clock N perceives signals from Clock T as spaced further apart, while Clock T sees signals from Clock N as closer together. This asymmetry leads to a definitive conclusion that Clock T will lag behind Clock N upon reunion, demonstrating the impact of distance on time dilation in accordance with special relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the equivalence principle
  • Basic knowledge of time dilation concepts
  • Awareness of special relativity equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the equivalence principle in gravitational physics
  • Study time dilation effects in accelerating frames of reference
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of special relativity equations
  • Investigate experimental confirmations of the equivalence principle
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the practical applications of general relativity and the nuances of time dilation effects.

PatrickPowers
Messages
237
Reaction score
1
Here is an explanations due to Daniel F. Styer, Prof Physics at Oberlin Daniel's original is at https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=bsp&ver=ohhl4rw8mbn4".

He uses general relativity and the equivalence principle. The equivalence principle is not entirely true -- it IS possible to distinguish between gravity and acceleration -- but Daniel says that it is good enough for this purpose, that no one has ever succeeded in measuring the difference. Consider an accelerating spaceship and two clocks. Clock T is in the tail and clock N is in the nose. Each clock sends out a signal once a second. The situation is not symmetric. Clock N measures that clock T's signals come more than one second apart, and clock T measures clock N's signals as closer than a second apart. Both clocks agree that T is slower: no paradox.

What's neat about this is that this difference depends on the distance between T and N. The further apart, the greater the differential in speed. This is what you need to get agreement with the special relativity equations: it depends directly on the distance between the clocks. When the two clocks are reunited the T clock will be behind the N clock by the appropriate amount.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am disturbed by the statement "The equivalence principle is not entirely true". I was under the impression that the equivalence principle is one of the best confirmed statements in physics - confirmed to ridiculously high precision (1 part in 10 to the 13 or something like that).
 
Matterwave said:
I am disturbed by the statement "The equivalence principle is not entirely true". I was under the impression that the equivalence principle is one of the best confirmed statements in physics - confirmed to ridiculously high precision (1 part in 10 to the 13 or something like that).

What I meant was that it is possible to distinguish a gravitational field from an accelerative psuedoforce. I read now that the equivalence principle is the equivalence of inertial and gravitational masses. Sorry about that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 208 ·
7
Replies
208
Views
16K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K