Two conducting spheres a distance d away with charges +q and -q

AI Thread Summary
The interaction between two conducting spheres with charges +q and -q cannot be simplified to point charges at their centers due to non-uniform charge distribution. As the spheres approach each other, their surface charges redistribute, leading to higher charge density in the areas closest together. This results in a stronger attractive force than predicted by the point charge approximation, as the effective distance between the interacting charges is less than the distance d. In contrast, if the spheres were insulators, the charge distribution would remain uniform, allowing for the point charge treatment. Thus, the presence of conducting materials significantly alters the force dynamics between the spheres.
Jaccobtw
Messages
163
Reaction score
32
Homework Statement
Two conducting spheres are a distance d away with charges +q and -q. Is the attractive force equal to, greater than, less than ##k_e q^2/d^2##, or zero
Relevant Equations
Coloumb's Law
you can treat the center of two conducting sphere's like two point charges. Therefore it should be equal to ##k_e q^2/d^2##, but the answer is greater than ##k_e q^2/d^2##. Can someone explain how? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The surce charge density in both spheres isn't uniform. Thus, we can't say the charge distribution can be replaced by a points charges at the spheres ' centers. Opposite charges tend to attract (they're closer) and this results in a larger force.
 
  • Like
Likes Jaccobtw and Delta2
Yes I think @Gordianus is right. I 'll try to explain a bit in more detail what he means:

Because the spheres are conductors, when we bring them close together their surface charges interact and more charge of each sphere is moved toward the areas of the spheres that are close together. So their surface charge density isn't uniform anymore and you can't treat the sphere as point charges. Because there are these accumulated charges positive on one sphere and negative on the other which are distanced apart much less than ##d##, the attractive force is bigger.

If the spheres were insulators then their charges wouldn't interact, the surface charge density on each sphere would remain uniform and you could treat the spheres as point charges.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top