Two current carrying wires. Confusion

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
18 replies · 3K views
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Let there be two current carrying wires with current flowing in the same direction. According to my book, they attract by the right hand rule. Now here is my question, since the B-field is popping inwards for one of the wires and the other one is popping outwards in the middle between the two wires, wouldn't that mean the B-field is 0? If it is then how can the B-field come back outwards and inwards again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flyingpig said:
If it is then how can the B-field come back outwards and inwards again?

I can't understand what you are asking
 
Then how can the Field come back in and out on the far right and left?
 
flyingpig said:
Then how can the Field come back in and out on the far right and left?

Why then can't? they are two independent fields ...

like for electric field ... if you place a conductor in its path ... it is zero inside it but again gains its strength outside it
 
cupid.callin said:
Why then can't? they are two independent fields ...

like for electric field ... if you place a conductor in its path ... it is zero inside it but again gains its strength outside it

But is the B-field only 0 at the mid point? Or is it everywhere between the two wires
 
only at the mid point because only at that point their strengths become equal and opposite

Edit:

Mag field due to long wire,
[tex]\vec{B}= \frac{\mu_{o}}{2\pi}\frac{i}{d}[/tex]
 
Just one other question, I noticed the "finger" cross product rule is different from the wrap around right hand rule (not the curl one, like most calculus textbook teaches one) and this observation uses the wrap around the current rule
 
Yes that one.

Another question

If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity.
 
flyingpig said:
Yes that one.
That's NOT a cross product at all. (Referring to the wrap around rule)

One question at a time, please! Your threads tend to get convoluted when you have multiple questions and/or topics in one post.

Another question

[STRIKE]If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity.[/STRIKE]
 
OKay I will make a new thread and ask it there
 
flyingpig said:
If I want to find the B-field created by the wire on the left, why would I use the distance between the wires? Let d be the distance between the wires, so shouldn't I use d + x where x is a positive quantity.

Why would you want to use d+x?

You need the B field (produced by the left wire) at the location of the wire on the right. The distance from on to the other is d.

Let x = 0 if you like.
 
SammyS said:
That's NOT a cross product at all. (Referring to the wrap around rule)

The thumb rule can be used to find the direction of cross product (if I'm getting correctly which rule is flyingpig talking about)