Two different answers for work done during compression

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
etotheipi
Homework Statement
Calculating work done during adiabatic compression (please see problem statement below)
Relevant Equations
Ideal gas laws, internal energy
I'm having a little trouble with part a) of this question:

Screenshot 2019-12-31 at 16.20.46.png

Since it is stated that the heating is slow, I thought it was reasonable to assume the process is reversible which means that the pressure in both sides should be equal. Consequently, $$W = - \int_{V_{0}}^{V_{1}} P dV = - \int_{V_{0}}^{V_{1}} kV^{- \gamma} dV = \frac{1}{\gamma-1}(P_{1}V_{1} - P_{0}V_{0})$$ For ##\gamma = 1.5##, the outside coefficient is ##2##.

However, if I use the first law (with ##Q=0## due to the insulated/adiabatic condition), I get $$W = \Delta U = \frac{3}{2}(nRT_{1} - nRT_{0}) = \frac{3}{2}(P_{1}V_{1} - P_{0}V_{0})$$I can't figure out why the two coefficients of ##(P_{1}V_{1} - P_{0}V_{0})## are different!

After this is sorted out, I assume it will just be a case of doing some rearrangement (i.e. w/ ##\frac{P_{0}V_{0}}{T_{0}} = \frac{P_{1}V_{1}}{T_{1}}## etc.) to get it into the required form?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
However, if I use the first law (with ##Q=0## due to the insulated/adiabatic condition), I get $$W = \Delta U = \frac{3}{2}(nRT_{1} - nRT_{0}) = \frac{3}{2}(P_{1}V_{1} - P_{0}V_{0})$$I can't figure out why the two coefficients of ##(P_{1}V_{1} - P_{0}V_{0})## are different!
The coefficient ##\frac{3}{2}## in ##\Delta U## is only for a monatomic ideal gas. Is the gas monatomic in this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
TSny said:
The coefficient ##\frac{3}{2}## in ##\Delta U## is only for a monatomic ideal gas. Is the gas monatomic in this problem?

Thank you, I just googled ##\gamma## for an ideal monatomic gas (it turns out to be roughly 1.66), which gives ##\frac{1}{\gamma-1} \approx 1.5##, as was obtained via the other method!
 
etotheipi said:
Thank you, I just googled ##\gamma## for an ideal monatomic gas (it turns out to be roughly 1.66), which gives ##\frac{1}{\gamma-1} \approx 1.5##, as was obtained via the other method!
Is everything OK now?

For a general ideal gas, ##U = nC_VT## and ##C_V = \frac{R}{\gamma - 1}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi