Calculating Magnetic Field Intensity Between Two Parallel Wires

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Wires
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field intensity at a point equidistant from two parallel wires carrying equal anti-parallel currents of 1.80 A, separated by a distance of 1.50 cm. The magnetic field intensity formula used is B = (μ₀I)/(2πr) for an infinite wire. Participants clarify that the magnetic fields from the two wires do not cancel out at the midpoint, contrary to initial assumptions, and emphasize the importance of vector analysis in determining the resultant magnetic field. The correct approach involves recognizing that the magnetic fields add up rather than cancel when the currents are anti-parallel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field calculations using the formula B = (μ₀I)/(2πr).
  • Familiarity with vector addition and cancellation in physics.
  • Knowledge of the concept of anti-parallel currents in electromagnetism.
  • Basic grasp of the geometry involved in magnetic field problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of vector fields in electromagnetism, focusing on magnetic field interactions.
  • Learn about the Biot-Savart Law and its application in calculating magnetic fields from current-carrying wires.
  • Explore the concept of magnetic field lines and their behavior around parallel currents.
  • Review problem-solving strategies for electromagnetism homework, particularly in vector analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to magnetic fields and current-carrying conductors.

Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two long parallel wires are a center-to-center distance of 1.50 cm apart and carry equal anti-parallel currents of 1.80 A. Find the magnetic field intensity at the point P which is equidistant from the wires. (R = 4.00 cm).

Homework Equations


B= \frac{u_{0}I}{2\pi r} infinite wire

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok I have been workin this problem for a while.
In terms of vectors, the y's cancel out.
For the X direction I get:
B_{totalx}=\frac{u_{0} I R}{\pi \sqrt( (d/2)^2 +R^2)}
I don't get why I am wrong, I took the sum of the b-fields in terms of vectors.
And no the answer is not 0 T!
 

Attachments

  • TwoParallelWires.jpg
    TwoParallelWires.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 626
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that the Magnetic field is not zero?
 
Thats what I thought originally , but it is incorrect.
 
If they have equal, anti-parallel currents, and it's a point that's equidistance from the wires, then the answer has to be zero. Unless you decide to ignore the fact that magnetic fields are vectors.
 
Anti-parallel.
 
PiratePhysicist said:
If they have equal, anti-parallel currents, and it's a point that's equidistance from the wires, then the answer has to be zero. Unless you decide to ignore the fact that magnetic fields are vectors.
Thats what I used to think too, but when I entered 0 T it is incorrect.
there is something else I am missing.
 
TVP45 said:
Anti-parallel.
got an idea?
 
Go back and ask your instructor what he means by anti-parallel. It has more than one meaning. It shouldn't but it does.
 
I agree, word choice could be better.
However I don't have contact with my prof. right now, this assignment is due in an hour.
 
  • #10
If I was you I would give your best guess (ignore that you know it's "not right") and argue for points later. Chances are others having the same problem.
 
  • #11
perhaps his answer is wrong by mistake? talk to other people in the class
 
  • #12
he is not, there is an answer I people got. There is some trick though, but my math tells me otherwise,
 
  • #13
PiratePhysicist said:
If they have equal, anti-parallel currents, and it's a point that's equidistance from the wires, then the answer has to be zero. Unless you decide to ignore the fact that magnetic fields are vectors.

? The two B fields add up, they don't cancel!
It's when the currents are in the same direction that the total B field is zero at the point midway between them.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Winzer said:
B= \frac{u_{0}I}{2\pi r} infinite wire
Good.

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok I have been workin this problem for a while.
In terms of vectors, the y's cancel out.
True.
For the X direction I get:
B_{totalx}=\frac{u_{0} I R}{\pi \sqrt( (d/2)^2 +R^2)}
I don't get why I am wrong, I took the sum of the b-fields in terms of vectors.
Show how you got that answer--it's not dimensionally correct, for one.
 
  • #15
OK, now that I can see your diagram, I see the instructor used anti-parallel in the correct sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
611