- #1
smclen
- 2
- 0
Hi All,
It's been a looong time since I've had to use/apply basic physics but I'm hoping I've come to the right place for help.
I am trying to help my brother-in-law with a speeding charge.
First question
The police allege he reached 100km/h within 38m of a corner.
The first question relates to the initial velocity a vehicle would have needed to be traveling in order to reach 100km/h (27.8 m/s) in 38m.
I calculate that as this vehicle can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 8.5, it would need 118.2m to get to 27.8 m/s from a standing start.
But I am unsure how to calculate what the initial velocity would need to be for this vehicle to reach 27.8 m/s in 40m.
Seconds question
The police also allege he was still traveling at 27.8 m/s 47m from a speed hump. Assuming 1 sec reaction time, I calculate that he would have been traveling at:
Formula used to calculate braking distance:
Vf2 = V02 - 2ad
where Vf is the final velocity, V0 is the initial velocity, a is the rate of deceleration and d is the distance traveled during deceleration. Since Vf will be zero when the car has stopped:
d = v02 / 2a
(I've assumed a = 10 m/s - is this realistic?)
d = 772.8 / 20 = 38.6m
Stopping distance incl. 1 sec reaction time = 38.6m + 27.8m = 66.4m
So, velocity after 47m braking:
Vf = Sq root (V02 - 2ad)
= Sq root (772.8 -2 x 10 x 19.2)
= 19.7 m/s
= 71 km/h
(where d = 47 metres minus the reaction distance of 27.8 metres = 19.2 metres)
At 71 km/h he would have done some serious damage to his car.
Thanks for your help - I apologise for my slopping logic in advance
It's been a looong time since I've had to use/apply basic physics but I'm hoping I've come to the right place for help.
I am trying to help my brother-in-law with a speeding charge.
First question
The police allege he reached 100km/h within 38m of a corner.
The first question relates to the initial velocity a vehicle would have needed to be traveling in order to reach 100km/h (27.8 m/s) in 38m.
I calculate that as this vehicle can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 8.5, it would need 118.2m to get to 27.8 m/s from a standing start.
But I am unsure how to calculate what the initial velocity would need to be for this vehicle to reach 27.8 m/s in 40m.
Seconds question
The police also allege he was still traveling at 27.8 m/s 47m from a speed hump. Assuming 1 sec reaction time, I calculate that he would have been traveling at:
Formula used to calculate braking distance:
Vf2 = V02 - 2ad
where Vf is the final velocity, V0 is the initial velocity, a is the rate of deceleration and d is the distance traveled during deceleration. Since Vf will be zero when the car has stopped:
d = v02 / 2a
(I've assumed a = 10 m/s - is this realistic?)
d = 772.8 / 20 = 38.6m
Stopping distance incl. 1 sec reaction time = 38.6m + 27.8m = 66.4m
So, velocity after 47m braking:
Vf = Sq root (V02 - 2ad)
= Sq root (772.8 -2 x 10 x 19.2)
= 19.7 m/s
= 71 km/h
(where d = 47 metres minus the reaction distance of 27.8 metres = 19.2 metres)
At 71 km/h he would have done some serious damage to his car.
Thanks for your help - I apologise for my slopping logic in advance