Two Resistance Problems (Circuits)

Click For Summary
A 480-Ω resistor was mistakenly soldered in place of a 320-Ω resistor in a circuit, and the discussion seeks a solution without removing components. For the second problem, two resistors in series consume a quarter of the power compared to when they are in parallel, with one resistor valued at 1.6 kΩ. The calculations for both problems reveal confusion, particularly with the first problem's resistance value, which should be 420-Ω instead of 480-Ω. The power equations for series and parallel configurations are discussed, emphasizing the need for careful reading of the problem statements. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying circuit formulas to arrive at accurate solutions.
AngeloG
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


15. (II) A close inspection of an electrical circuit reveals that a 480-Ω resistor was inadvertently soldered in the place where a 320-Ω resistor is needed. How can this be fixed without removing anything from the existing circuit?

16. (II) Two resistors when connected in series to a 110-V line use one fourth the power that is used when they are connected in parallel. If one resistor is 1.6-kΩ, what is the resistance of the other?

Homework Equations


P=IV
V=IR
Rt (series) = R1+R1...
Rt (paralell) = (1/R1 + 1/R2...)^-1

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/3694/problems1mf2.th.jpg

This isn't homework; just going through every problem in my Physics book for the upcoming exam =p.

For 15, the back of the book says it's 960-Ω, not sure why? I'm getting a different answer. Maybe someone can clarify as to why.

For 16, I'm pretty sure I did it completely wrong heh =p.

P=IV, I = V / Rt

P(series) = 4*P(parallel)

(V/Rts) * V = 4*[ (V/Rtp) * V ]
Rts = 1600-Ω + x-Ω
Rtp = [(1/1600-Ω) + (1/x-Ω) ]^-1

V^2 / Rts = 4*[V^2/Rtp]

Solving for X, Maple spits out --> -1400-200*I*sqrt(15), -1400+200*I*sqrt(15) Which both seems extremely highly unlikely =p.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well for question 15, you used 420 ohms instead of 480 ohms in your calculation!
 
Last edited:
Doh! Haha, that could be the problem =p.

It helps to read carefully :s.
 
I read it as P(series) = 0.25*P(parallel), which is the other way around from what you have. I have a solution, here's how I set it up:

For series circuit:

Since the current will be the same in both resistors, the power can be expressed as

P = I^2R = I_s^2(R_1 + R_2) where Is is the current in the series circuit.

For the parallel circuit:

The voltage across each resistor will be the same, so the total power will be (with a little simplifying)

P_p =\frac{V^2}{R_1} + \frac{V^2}{R_2} = \frac{V^2(R_1+R_2)}{R_1R_2}

You will also need to use the relation V=I_sR_T = I_s (R_1+R_2)

Since the power used by the series circuit is 0.25 that of the parallel, you can relate the two expressions and solve for R2. No Maple should be needed!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K