Two small beads having positive charges 3q and q are fixed

  • Thread starter Thread starter richyw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Positive
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, two fixed positive charges, 3q and q, are positioned on a horizontal insulating rod, and a third charged bead is introduced to find its equilibrium position. The equilibrium point is established, and it is confirmed that a positive charge can achieve stable equilibrium due to the restoring force that acts to return it to equilibrium after any small displacement. In contrast, a negative charge would experience an unstable equilibrium, as any deviation would result in it being accelerated towards one of the fixed charges. The relationship between force and potential is highlighted, emphasizing that a minimum potential indicates stable equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electrostatic forces
  • Familiarity with concepts of equilibrium in physics
  • Knowledge of potential energy and its relation to force
  • Basic calculus, specifically second derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Coulomb's Law and its applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about potential energy in electric fields and how to calculate it
  • Explore the concept of stable and unstable equilibrium in physics
  • Investigate the role of derivatives in determining the nature of equilibrium points
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electrostatics and equilibrium concepts, as well as educators seeking to explain the principles of force and potential energy in charged systems.

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two small beads having positive charges 3q and q are fixed at opposite ends of a horizontal insulating rod, extending from the origin to the point x=d. A third small charged bead is free to slide on the rod. At what point is the third bead in equilibrium?

Explain whether it can be in stable equilibrium

Homework Equations



\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have already found the equilibrium point. My trouble is explaining whether it can be in stable equilibrium. The answer says as long as it is a positive charge it can be. Is this because if it were a negative particle, any deviation from equilibrium and it would be accelerated into one of the two charges, whereas if it were positive it would oscillate until it reached equilibrium?

This makes sense in my head but I don't really know how to "show" it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
richyw said:
I have already found the equilibrium point. My trouble is explaining whether it can be in stable equilibrium. The answer says as long as it is a positive charge it can be. Is this because if it were a negative particle, any deviation from equilibrium and it would be accelerated into one of the two charges, whereas if it were positive it would oscillate until it reached equilibrium?

This makes sense in my head but I don't really know how to "show" it.

That's basically the reason, yes. In the stable case, the force will push it back towards the equilibrium, and not away from it.

Another way to think about it is that the force on the particle is related to a potential through \mathbf{F} = - \nabla V \left( x \right). If the equilibrium point corresponds to a potential minimum, the equilibrium will be stable, whereas a maximum gives an unstable equilibrium (e.g. a ball rolling down a hill, or being stuck in a valley). And, of course, you can determine if it's a maximum or minimum by considering the second derivative of the potential function, the sign of which will depend on the sign of the charge.
 
ah thank you. that makes perfect sense now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
959
Replies
1
Views
1K