1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Tying to use Zangwill's EM book for multilayer R and T coeff

  1. Feb 2, 2015 #1

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    I am trying to use Zangwill's book to calculate the transmisson (T) and reflexion (R) coefficients for an EM plane wave going through 3 layers. (the intermediate layer has a width d).
    I am reading pages 604/605, he defines "N+1" as the number of layers in which layer 0 is half infinite (from say ##x=-\infty## to x=0) and layer N is also semi infinite and extends to positive infinite.
    The book reaches a system of 2 equations with 2 unknows: [tex]\begin{bmatrix} 1+R \\ (1-R)Z_0^{-1} \end{bmatrix}=\prod _{j=1}^{N-1} \begin{bmatrix} \cos \phi _j && -i Z_j \sin \phi _j \\ -iZ_j ^{-1}\sin \phi _j && \cos \phi _j \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} T \\ TZ_N^{-1} \end{bmatrix}[/tex] where the 2 unknowns are R and T. In fact I don't understand why these are 2 unknows since when we know one of them we know both of them since R+T must equal 1.


    2. The attempt at a solution
    I have 3 layers so N+1=3, so N=2. So if I use the formula given in the book, the product goes from j=1 to N-1=1 so I have only 1 term for the product.
    Then I manually solved the system of equations for T and reached that [tex]T=\frac{2n_1/(c \mu_0 )}{\left ( \frac{-in_2}{c\mu_1} \right ) \sin (n_2 d \omega /c) + \cos (n_2 d \omega /c) \left ( \frac{n_3}{c \mu_2} \right ) + \left ( \frac{n_1}{c\mu_0} \right ) [\cos (n_2 d \omega /c) -\frac{in_2}{c \varepsilon_1} \sin (n_2 d \omega /c) \frac{n_3}{c \mu _2}] }[/tex] where the notation is a bit misleading since ##n_i## is the refractive index of the i'th layer while ##\varepsilon _i## and ##\mu _i## corresponds to the i-1'th layers.
    What I don't like about my result is that it depends on ##\varepsilon _i## and ##\mu _i## and given the problem statement I would have hoped to get all in terms of ##n_i## instead but I see no way of reaching that.
    Then I'm told to calculate explicitely T and R for particular values of ##n_1##, ##n_2## and ##n_3##. So I don't know where I went wrong...
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 3, 2015 #2

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Assuming that the 3 mediums have the same permeability than free space (##\mu_0##), I reach that [tex]T=\frac{2n_1}{(n_1+n_3)\cos (n_2 d \omega /c)-i (n_2+n_3)\sin (n_2d \omega /c)}[/tex]. However I see that this is a complex number which cannot be right. I am wondering whether the matrix formula from Zangwill's book that I posted here is well suited to solve my problem. Can someone confirm that I can reach what I want using that formula and that I probably made some arithmetic errors somewhere... Thanks.
     
  4. Feb 3, 2015 #3

    fluidistic

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Maybe I should take the absolute value of my result and square it up... I find the book extremely confusing about what is meant by "T" and "R". Apparently it is used for more than 1 physical concept...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Tying to use Zangwill's EM book for multilayer R and T coeff
Loading...