Types of Kinematics: Classical, Quantum & Relativistic

  • Thread starter Thread starter crastinus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
Kinematics is defined as the study of motion without considering its causes, and it can be categorized into three main types: classical, quantum, and relativistic kinematics. The discussion raises the question of whether there is a concept of "statistical kinematics" related to local motions studied in statistical mechanics. Participants express frustration over the lack of clarity in classifications and terminology, noting that definitions can evolve over time. It is suggested to consult multiple university resources for consistent definitions to clarify any confusion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context and evolution of kinematic terms.
crastinus
Messages
78
Reaction score
9
I was taught that kinematics is the study of local motion without references to its causes (like forces, fields, etc.). That seems useful to say but perhaps it is not really that helpful.

What are the kinds of kinematics?

I can think of three kinds: classical kinematics (from mean speed to acceleration and vectors), quantum kinematics, and relativistic kinematics.

Is that right? Is there a way to consider the local motions of things typically studied in statistical mechanics? That is, does anyone talk about "statistical kinematics"?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crastinus said:
That seems useful to say but perhaps it is not really that helpful.
You are totally right. It's just words. If you want to find out more about what your 'teachers' meant by the term, they are the ones to challenge and there's no reason to feel bad that you are confused.

I, personally, have a big problem with things being classified with no proper explanation. The words change over the years yet the content of topics don't. It's alsmost as bad as urban slang in many ways.

Try googling the terms you are confused about and, if what you read is consistent over a number of University Course sites, then the definitions are probably OK.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top