Types of Kinematics: Classical, Quantum & Relativistic

  • Thread starter Thread starter crastinus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
Kinematics is defined as the study of motion without considering its causes, and it can be categorized into three main types: classical, quantum, and relativistic kinematics. The discussion raises the question of whether there is a concept of "statistical kinematics" related to local motions studied in statistical mechanics. Participants express frustration over the lack of clarity in classifications and terminology, noting that definitions can evolve over time. It is suggested to consult multiple university resources for consistent definitions to clarify any confusion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context and evolution of kinematic terms.
crastinus
Messages
78
Reaction score
9
I was taught that kinematics is the study of local motion without references to its causes (like forces, fields, etc.). That seems useful to say but perhaps it is not really that helpful.

What are the kinds of kinematics?

I can think of three kinds: classical kinematics (from mean speed to acceleration and vectors), quantum kinematics, and relativistic kinematics.

Is that right? Is there a way to consider the local motions of things typically studied in statistical mechanics? That is, does anyone talk about "statistical kinematics"?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crastinus said:
That seems useful to say but perhaps it is not really that helpful.
You are totally right. It's just words. If you want to find out more about what your 'teachers' meant by the term, they are the ones to challenge and there's no reason to feel bad that you are confused.

I, personally, have a big problem with things being classified with no proper explanation. The words change over the years yet the content of topics don't. It's alsmost as bad as urban slang in many ways.

Try googling the terms you are confused about and, if what you read is consistent over a number of University Course sites, then the definitions are probably OK.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top