In the first problem set of chapter 1, problem 1-8(b) deals with angle preserving transformations. In the newest edition of the book the problem is stated(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If there is a basis x_1, x_2, ...., x_n and numbers a_1, a_2, ...., a_n such that Tx_i = a_i x_i, then the transformation T is angle preserving if and only if all |a_i| are equal.

In the first edition (the one with the cool blue diagrams that you can actually see), the absolute value bars are omitted on the a_i. However, I'm pretty sure there are counterexamples to both formulations. If the basis happened to be orthogonal, then equal absolute values of the a_i would be enough, but if the basis were oblique, then you would need equality of the a_i. But the author doesn't mention orthogonality until a couple exercises later. Am I missing something?

thanks.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Typo in spivak's calculus on manifolds?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**