Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dual basis and differential forms

  1. Dec 28, 2010 #1
    I was reading about dual spaces and dual bases in the book Linear Algebra by Friedberg, Spence and Insel (FSI) and they give an example of a linear functional, f_i (x) = a_i where [x]_β = [a_1 a_2 ... a_n] denotes the matrix representation of x in terms of the basis β = {x_1, x_2, ..., x_n} of V. Now they go on to prove that {f_1, f_2, ..., f_n} is in fact the dual basis of β for V* by actually never using the fact that f_i (x) = a_i, but rather that f_i (x_j) = δ_ij, where δ_ij denotes the Kronecker delta function. I also happened to have read other references by Halmos and Lang and they did not go about actually finding the linear functionals, but rather use the fact that a linear functional that satisfies φ_i (x_j) = δ_ij exists. Now I suppose my question is, doesn't it so happen that the dual basis of β ALWAYS equals {f_1, f_2, ..., f_n} as defined by FSI? Because since φ and f agree on the basis elements in turns out that φ_i = f_i for all x.

    Now here is where differential forms come in. I was reading do Carmo's book on Differential forms and he says that the basis of R³ is {dx_i; i = 1,2,3} where x_i represents the i-th coordinate function. So I guess its true that dx_i = f_i(x) from above then right? I, to be honest, find this a bit unexpected as x_i is precisely f_i when we're using the canonical basis, yet differentiating doesn't mess it up. So I actually went on to check it on some values that dx_i really does equal f_i(x). And so it seems to also verify what I was asking in the first paragraph.

    Is this all right? I'd appreciate someone clarifying some of this stuff to me.


    EDIT: I guess another way of putting my question is, is the dual basis unique, in the sense that the linear functionals that form the basis are always identically equal to f_i(x) as given by FSI?
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 28, 2010 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Another way of putting your question is:

    If you have two lists f and g of linear functionals satisfying:
    fi(xj) = δ_ij
    gi(xj) = δ_ij​

    Can you prove that, for each i,
    fi = gi
  4. Dec 28, 2010 #3
    I guess I could since they agree on basis elements they should be equal - that's a result from linear algebra. I guess that answers my question, but the differential form example sorta throws me off...
  5. Dec 28, 2010 #4
    I suppose the purpose of 'rewriting' the f_i (x) as dx_i is probably just more convenient as it is "differential" forms.
  6. Dec 28, 2010 #5
    The purpose is that do Carmo's is interested in differential forms defined on a manifold (or in an open set of it), not just on a single point. Therefore, given a manifold M and [itex]p \in M[/itex] and R3 is its tangent space at p, then the dual basis to the canonical one is indeed dx_i(p) and is exactly the same as the dual basis as defined in linear algebra.

    This notation is useful when, for example, you have a function f defined on an open set U of M and you need df, which is then written (usually supressing p):

    [tex]df(p) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n}a_{i}\left(p\right)dx_{i}\left(p\right)[/tex]

    Where the a_i's are (usually) smooth functions on U.
  7. Dec 29, 2010 #6
    Ahh that makes sense to me now. Thanks a lot JSuarez! Also thanks to Hurkyl for helping me out too! :smile:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Dual basis and differential forms
  1. Dual Basis (Replies: 5)

  2. Forming a basis (Replies: 3)