U-238 spacings and Zeta function zeroes?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter houlahound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Zeta function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential correlation between energy spacings in uranium-238 (U-238) and the zero spacings of the Riemann zeta function. Participants explore the implications of a student's unpublished project that suggested a pattern, while questioning the validity and significance of such a connection.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions that the student’s work indicates spacings in U-238 transitions resemble the zero spacings of the zeta function, but questions the validity of this claim.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism, suggesting that similar patterns could arise from random occurrences rather than meaningful physics.
  • A different participant finds the idea intriguing but also suggests it may lean towards numerology rather than rigorous science.
  • Concerns are raised about the methodology used in the student report, particularly regarding how the data was binned and presented.
  • Some participants note that while there are interesting mathematical connections, such as the Thue-Morse series, they may not be relevant to the physical properties of U-238.
  • One participant references the difficulty of proving the Riemann hypothesis and the attempts by some physicists to relate it to quantum mechanics, although they argue this may not directly pertain to uranium.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to read the original Montgomery paper that is cited in the student report, indicating a lack of access to it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the significance or validity of the claims made in the student report. There are multiple competing views regarding the relevance of the observed patterns and the methodology employed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the student report's methodology, including the way data was binned and the indirect references to other works. There is also uncertainty regarding the implications of the connections drawn between the zeta function and nuclear energy levels.

houlahound
Messages
907
Reaction score
223
I read some old unpublished student notes where the student in an undergrad project was looking at general patterns in QM results.

Seemed arbitrary to claim anything but the student did show that spacings in EV between transitions in U238 followed the same general form of zero spacings in the Zeta function. There was no attempt to look at other nucleus or explain why.
Assuming the student work is correct is there a research field that would cover this or is anyone aware of this particular match between energy spacings in nucleus and the spacing of zeroes in the Zeta function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've seen several fringe theories that try to fit some data into a simple mathematical formula, for example the Heim theory "formulae" for the masses of elementary particles. If someone examines the spectral data of all atoms for which it's available and then tries to fit all of them one at a time into a large number of mathematical rules, it's likely that they will eventually find something that seems to be a good fit but is actually a random occurrence with no physical significance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: houlahound
Yeah I was dubious on those grounds. The paper/report seem to be a primer to justify further research...reeks a bit of numerology under the pretence of physics.

Pretty neat just the same it matches with Zeta zeroes. whole thing sounds cool and spooky, prolly why I hung onto it from years ago. I guess I can clear that space out now.

One interesting thing I did get out of it was a series called;

"The Thue-Morse Series".

Seems a cool set of numbers, in the process if googling it. Hope its legit.

ETA; ya, seems legit, not sure what a s[n] function is tho;

https://www.google.com.au/amp/m.wikihow.com/Generate-the-Thue-Morse-Sequence?amp=1
 
Some people may try to assign some kind of mystical significance to the zeta function, mostly because the related Riemann hypothesis is so difficult to prove. Some mathematical physicists have tried to approach the problem by attempting to construct a quantum operator that has a spectrum that consists of the imaginary parts of the zeta function zeroes, but that probably doesn't have much to do with uranium.

There are some strange coincidences related to physical constants, such as that found by Dirac , which may have some actual unknown meaning, but it takes quite a lot of statistical intuition to see what coincidences are important and which ones aren't.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: houlahound
I can see the appeal, makes for great chatter at a cocktail party...how much productive physics is involved I don't know.

Makes me question what all the hoopla is about re global patterns in complex systems yadyada.

Thanks for link, be an interesting read I am hoping.
 
houlahound said:
but the student did show that spacings in EV between transitions in U238 followed the same general form of zero spacings in the Zeta function.

I'm looking at both now, and they don't look anything like each other.
 
I reread the report, it is a bit misleading. It took spacing between peaks and plotted them in bins 9eV wide and showed the frequency of how many peaks were in the 9 EV bins. ie;

0-9 2
9-18 8
18-27 7
27-36 5
36-45 3

The Zeta function is shoe horned into the text via results from a paper by Montgomery in the 70's the reference cited as;

Barry Copra, Prime formula Weds Number Theory and Quantum Physics, Science vol 274, 20 December 1996 pp 2014-2015.

I don't have access to this paper. the student claims the freeman Dyson said

"Freeman Dyson saw Montgomery's work ...zeroes of the Zeta function behaved like the solutions that physicists were using to calculate energy levels in large nuclei..."

paraphrased for brevity.

The more I read the report the more I don't like it. Not worth the time. I wouldn't mind reading the Montgomery paper tho but it is only indirectly referenced via above source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K