UK Plutonium Problem: Fast Reactor or MOx Plant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter koab1mjr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uk
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The UK is currently evaluating its options for managing plutonium stocks, with discussions centered around the implementation of GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy's (GEH) Prism fast reactors versus the construction of a MOx plant. The University of Manchester is set to provide expertise to GEH in promoting fast reactor technology as a viable solution for plutonium disposal while generating power. Advocates for fast reactors argue that this approach not only addresses waste management but also contributes to energy production, while concerns about the long-term storage of plutonium and its potential future utility remain prevalent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fast reactor technology, specifically GEH Prism reactors.
  • Knowledge of MOx fuel production processes and implications.
  • Familiarity with nuclear waste management practices.
  • Awareness of the role of academic institutions, like the University of Manchester, in nuclear energy research.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles and benefits of GEH Prism fast reactors.
  • Investigate the environmental and economic impacts of MOx fuel plants.
  • Explore current nuclear waste management strategies and their effectiveness.
  • Examine the contributions of academic institutions in advancing nuclear technology.
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, energy policy makers, environmental scientists, and anyone involved in nuclear waste management and energy production strategies.

koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I was curious to know the PF communities opinion on the recent press the UK has been generating in its choice on retrying a MOx plant or dabbling with a Fast Reactor Tech


How would you all vote if you were in charge?


I am for fast reactors since the industry needs the push but I am biased as a young person in the field.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thermalne said:
I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!

Why should we get rid of the plutonium (I assume weapon grade)? It was produced at horrendous expense. If we burn it now and then need it again (asteroid blasting?), we will need to make it again.

What's the problem with just storing it somewhere secure?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
5K