UN PHYS 220A - Physics friction problem - why take smaller steps on ice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ritwik06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Physics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of walking on ice, specifically addressing why a person would take smaller steps on a low-friction surface. Participants explore the relationship between step size, friction, and stability while walking.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the assumption that longer steps would reduce the normal force and explore the implications of step size on frictional force. Others discuss the angles created by different step sizes and how they affect stability and slipping.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights into the mechanics of walking on ice and questioning the assumptions presented in a textbook. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, with various interpretations being explored without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference a textbook that suggests smaller steps result in lesser friction, which is causing confusion. The discussion highlights the need to clarify the relationship between step size, friction, and the forces involved in walking on a slippery surface.

ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A man tries to walk on ice[Very less friction]. He takes small steps rather than large ones. Why?


The Attempt at a Solution


I think he should have taken longer steps in order to reduce the normal reaction and consequently the friction which ensures low velocity. What's wrong with this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ritwik06 said:

Homework Statement


A man tries to walk on ice[Very less friction]. He takes small steps rather than large ones. Why?


The Attempt at a Solution


I think he should have taken longer steps in order to reduce the normal reaction and consequently the friction which ensures low velocity. What's wrong with this?

Think about the angle his legs will make with the ice when taking small steps versus large steps.

HINT: He wants to increase the frictional force, not decrease it, to keep from sliding.

CS
 


stewartcs said:
Think about the angle his legs will make with the ice when taking small steps versus large steps.

HINT: He wants to increase the frictional force, not decrease it, to keep from sliding.

CS

Thats the clinch. I have a clear picture of the angle, the normal and verything.

I just cannot understand this thing:
He wants to increase the frictional force, not decrease it, to keep from sliding.
 


The thing is that I was doing my book exercises, I encountered this:
Objective:
While walking on ice, one should take small steps to avoid slipping. This is because smaller steps ensure:
1. larger friction
2. smaller friction
3. larger normal force
4. smaller normal force
Th answer given is (2. smaller friction). The book is written by a well known writer and its difficult for me to understand what actually happens. Please help me.
 


ritwik06 said:
Thats the clinch. I have a clear picture of the angle, the normal and verything.

I just cannot understand this thing:
He wants to increase the frictional force, not decrease it, to keep from sliding.

Frictional force is proportional to the weight straight down into the ice. The greater the step the greater the horizontal force that must be accounted for by friction to prevent slipping. (Remember Bambi's first steps on the ice?)

Since with increasing angle the less friction that gets created and the more that is required ... oops.
 


What makes you think that longer steps would reduce the normal force? No matter how long the steps are, the normal force is his weight!
 


ritwik06 said:
The thing is that I was doing my book exercises, I encountered this:
Objective:
While walking on ice, one should take small steps to avoid slipping. This is because smaller steps ensure:
1. larger friction
2. smaller friction
3. larger normal force
4. smaller normal force
Th answer given is (2. smaller friction). The book is written by a well known writer and its difficult for me to understand what actually happens. Please help me.
You sure that's what it says? Because that's the opposite of what you would expect the man to do if he wanted to keep from slipping. Why would he take smaller steps if it resulted in lesser friction -> greater chance of slipping?
 


Your mass plus the acceleration of gravity gives a Force vector (F_{you})that, when you stand straight up and down, is directly opposite the normal force, correct? But, when your legs spread wider than your shoulders (when you get an angle in there), you can decompose F_{you} into a vertical and a horizontal force. Normally, when you do the splits, the horizontal component of that vector is opposed by your own leg muscles (your abductors) and by the friction of the surface. When you're on a low-friction surface (or a no-friction surface), the horizontal component of F_{you} is opposed only by your own muscles, which makes walking much more fatiguing.

Now for a less physicsy explanation. ;)

True, your normal force is always your weight. But what is walking, really? Typically, it's falling (with style) -- a controlled fall. You shift your weight forward and as you fall, you bring a leg out and you land on that leg. You then shift your weight forward and as you fall you bring your other leg out and you land on that leg.

When you really don't want to fall, you can put your leg out in front of you then slowly shift your weight from leg to leg, but this is slower, it's not how we normally walk. But when you're on a low friction surface, it's easy to see that it's difficult to shift your weight from leg to leg if you're almost doing the splits, if your legs are far apart.

If you're walking like normal, it's also easier to "catch" yourself if you're only falling for a short distance, if you take smaller steps.

Also, when you take smaller steps, you don't have to use your leg muscles as much to prevent yourself from doing the splits as you're walking. Normally, surface friction helps to stop your legs from skating out from under you.
 


ritwik06 said:
The thing is that I was doing my book exercises, I encountered this:
Objective:
While walking on ice, one should take small steps to avoid slipping. This is because smaller steps ensure:
1. larger friction
2. smaller friction
3. larger normal force
4. smaller normal force
Th answer given is (2. smaller friction). The book is written by a well known writer and its difficult for me to understand what actually happens. Please help me.

Ah, I see what they are really after now. I think they could have posed the question a bit better though.

He will want to decrease his horizontal component of force by taking smaller steps, not the friction between his feet and the ice. The reason for this is due to the fact that the maximum static frictional force to prevent him from sliding is fixed by his weight and the coefficient of friction between the ice and his foot (I was implying that this needed to be increased to prevent slipping in my previous post). The maximum static frictional force does not change with the angle between his legs and the ice since the normal component is fixed by his weight. However, the horizontal component does change with the angle.

Hence, if he increases his angle by taking larger steps, the horizontal component of force is increased and eventually that will overcome the maximum static frictional force present between his foot and the ice, thus causing him to slide.

Note: The angle increasing or decreasing depends on where the angle is referenced from.

CS
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
53K
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K