Walking on Ice: Small Steps for Safety

  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice Safety
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of walking on ice, specifically the reasoning behind taking smaller steps to prevent slipping. Participants explore the relationship between step size, friction, and normal force in the context of icy surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to connect the size of steps with frictional forces and normal force, suggesting that smaller steps lead to larger normal force and thus safer walking. Some participants question the assertion that smaller friction leads to less slipping, while others delve into the mechanics of walking and the forces involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the physics involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the mechanics of walking, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct reasoning or answer to the original question.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about friction on ice and the implications of different step sizes. The original problem statement presents multiple-choice options that are being debated, highlighting the complexity of the situation.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



While walking on ice,one should take small steps to avoid slipping.Because the smaller step ensures
(i)larger friction
(ii)smaller friction
(iii)larger normal force
(iv)smaller normal force

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I have the following idea.While walking we put step such that frictional force by the ground helps us to proceed.Now,friction co-eff of ice being small,ice does not provide us with the friction---in other words,ice does not prevent our leg from slipping beyond our control.And we might fall.So,we make smaller,careful steps,avoiding hurry,so, that we get larger normal force,and we can safely proceed...

so,in my opinion, the correct result should be (i) and (iii).

But the answer given is (ii)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, I agree with you. I don't see how smaller friction causes less slipping.
 
First I will quote my problem:

While walking on ice,one should take small steps to avoid slipping.Because the smaller step ensures
(i)larger friction
(ii)smaller friction
(iii)larger normal force
(iv)smaller normal force

Now,let us see how do we walk.I will cansider a man walking.His back leg pushes the ground back while his front leg (heel,to be specific) thrusts the ground forward.

So,the relative motion at the point of contact is backwards for back leg and forward for front leg.

Ground provides contact force at front and rear legs-these contact forces can be resolved to normal components and horizontal components.Horizontal components are known as friction.

So,friction acts forward for the back leg (f₁) and backward for the front leg (f₂).

The force equations would be: N₁+N₂ =mg
& f₁-f₂ =ma
As it turns out,it is not only the force equations that matter really.We are also to consider the torque equations.

Let the difference between the legs in equilibrium be 2L
Then,we have to have (N₁-N₂)L=(f₁-f₂)h where h is the CM height.

Clearly less L means less (f₁-f₂) [which is significant for walking].Note that it is not individually f₁ or, f₂ that counts.It is the (f₁-f₂) term that is significant.

So,less stride ensures less "effective" friction...

In ice, the term (f₁-f₂) is very small,so,for safe walking L should be less.I mean,less stride ensures the proper condition of walking...

And,lastly,I will say something why do people fall while walking on ice.I may neglect friction which--->0.
Then,(N₁-N₂)L=0 and N₁=N₂
Let the man lift his back leg from ice floor while walking.Then,only the torque -N₂L is working on him that makes him fall facing the heaven...and what if he stands and then starts to walk?

in that case,there is nothing to drive him forward.I already assumed friction absent...

So,if he tries to proceed,he will fall according to first law...
 
That link really does not help too much.And I think my explanation is OK.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K