Uncertainty in area of a circle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the area of a circle given a radius with uncertainty. The original poster expresses confusion about applying uncertainty equations, particularly involving sigma and partial derivatives, in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of logarithmic differentiation to derive uncertainty equations. There are questions about the relevance of natural logarithms and the use of relative errors in calculations. Some participants explore the relationship between differentials and uncertainty propagation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some suggesting methods involving logarithmic differentiation and others questioning the necessity of these methods. There is a mix of understanding and uncertainty about the application of partial derivatives and standard formulas for uncertainty in measurements.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of familiarity with sigma and partial derivatives due to their current coursework. The problem is situated within an introductory physics lab context focused on error propagation and measurement uncertainty.

zero13428
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The radius of a circle is measured to be 14.3+-0.3cm. Find the circle's area and the uncertainty in the area.

I don't understand how to correctly apply uncertainty equations with sigma and partial derivatives to these types of problems.

Homework Equations



A=(pi)(r^2)
(pi)(r^2)=642.4cm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well then, we have A=πr2. If we take ln of both sides we will get

lnA=ln(πr2)=lnπ+2lnr

Now just take differentials

dA/A = 2*dr/r

dA is nothing but the error in A. Same with dr. Just substitute the numbers.

I really could not explain it properly without showing you the differentials.
 
You said to take the ln of both sides. As in the natural log? I didn't know these had anything to logs or am I reading something wrong.
 
zero13428 said:
You said to take the ln of both sides. As in the natural log? I didn't know these had anything to logs or am I reading something wrong.

Well normally, to get the error, you would just add the relative errors. I showed you how to do it.

So if you had A=r3 then dA/A = 3*dr/r

It comes out the same if you just differentiate it normally.
 
I know at the beginning I asked how to use sigma and partial derivatives to solve this type of problem but I don't really know much about them yet. We haven't gotten to them in my math class. This problem is coming from an intro to physics lab course that focuses on propagation of error and uncertainty in measurements made and then using Excel functions like STDEV and (chi^2) to figure out stuff related to uncertainties.

Is there a standard formula to use if given a measurement or multiple measurements and the uncertainity in them?

"dA/A", is that supposed to be a partial derivative?
 
zero13428 said:
I know at the beginning I asked how to use sigma and partial derivatives to solve this type of problem but I don't really know much about them yet. We haven't gotten to them in my math class. This problem is coming from an intro to physics lab course that focuses on propagation of error and uncertainty in measurements made and then using Excel functions like STDEV and (chi^2) to figure out stuff related to uncertainties.

Is there a standard formula to use if given a measurement or multiple measurements and the uncertainity in them?

In that case, you can just find the areas with the radii given and then find the standard deviation, which would be how much the measurement deviates from the mean. Measuring its error.

zero13428 said:
"dA/A", is that supposed to be a partial derivative?

If you had like one value alone and you wanted to get the error,

dA would be the error in A.
A would be the actual measurement.

The relative error in A would then be dA/A
 
Actually I think I got it worked out. Let me know if this looks right.

A=(∏)(r)^2
∂(A)/∂(r) = 2(∏)(r)

sigma_A=√(((∂A/∂r)^2)(sigma_r)^2))

sigma_A=√(((2∏(14.3))^2)(0.3)^2))= 26.9cm

Area = 642.4cm
Uncertainty = 26.9cm
 
zero13428 said:
Actually I think I got it worked out. Let me know if this looks right.

A=(∏)(r)^2
∂(A)/∂(r) = 2(∏)(r)

sigma_A=√(((∂A/∂r)^2)(sigma_r)^2))

sigma_A=√(((2∏(14.3))^2)(0.3)^2))= 26.9cm

Area = 642.4cm
Uncertainty = 26.9cm

If you wanted to use the partial derivative ∂A, as the error in A, then it should read like this

∂A/∂r= 2πr or ∂A=2πr ∂r

Now if we divide both sides by A (which is πr2 as well)

∂A/A = 2πr/πr2 ∂r

or ∂A/A = 2∂r/r
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K