Uncertainty of the speed of light in vacuum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of light in vacuum is defined as 299,792,458 meters per second (m/s) with no associated uncertainty due to its status as a defined constant. This definition is crucial because it directly influences the measurement of the meter, which is based on the distance light travels in a specific time frame. As such, any measurement of the speed of light will yield this defined value, regardless of experimental conditions. The discussion clarifies that while the speed of light is a natural constant, the meter is a human-defined unit that can be adjusted to maintain this definition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of physical constants and their definitions
  • Familiarity with the concept of measurement in physics
  • Knowledge of the relationship between speed, distance, and time
  • Basic grasp of the metric system and its units
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical definitions of the meter and how they have evolved
  • Explore the implications of redefining physical constants in scientific measurements
  • Learn about the role of atomic clocks in defining the second
  • Investigate the concept of uncertainty in physical measurements and its significance
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, educators, students in science fields, and anyone interested in the foundations of measurement and physical constants.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283
Hi all,
According to this site : http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/, the speed of light in vacuum is 299792458 \frac{m}{s} with no uncertainty! How is that that there's no uncertainty? I like this website because it gives many physics constants with their uncertainties, but here I have to say that I'm septic.
 
Science news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
Hi all,
According to this site : http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/, the speed of light in vacuum is 299792458 \frac{m}{s} with no uncertainty! How is that that there's no uncertainty? I like this website because it gives many physics constants with their uncertainties, but here I have to say that I'm septic.
The speed of light is defined to be that figure, hence there is no uncertainty.
 
yup that's what c is defined as. full stop,,, or:

i appreciate the notion of uncertainty around c but any uncertainty would actually manifest itself in the length of a meter, to explain:

light travels at 299792458 meters every second
this is what has been decided and will not change.

the meter is defined as how far light travels in 1/299792458ths of a second
to further explain:

lets say the guys measuring the speed of light were all drunk and messed up the experiment horribly! and in actual fact light travels twice as fast as they had measured, what are the implications?

well, funnily enough, the speed of light would remain at 299792458m/s but the meter would have doubled in length.

you could say that instead of the meter doubling in length that the duration of 1 second is halved, but this wouldn't work as the second is linked to radiation from the caesium 133 atom.

its a good one alright
 
I'm not sure I understand well. So it has been defined, but light has a real speed which certainly isn't the one defined. So has it been defined (so without uncertainty) in order to make more precise the length of a meter for example? (and I guess many other physics constants are by this way more precise). If yes, what's the meaning of what phlegmy said : measuring the speed of light? If it is already known (and perfectly known...), what's the point of measuring the speed of light?
 
fluidistic said:
So has it been defined (so without uncertainty) in order to make more precise the length of a meter for example?
Yes.
If yes, what's the meaning of what phlegmy said : measuring the speed of light? If it is already known (and perfectly known...), what's the point of measuring the speed of light?
It wasn't known until it was measured. But at some point, our ability to measure it exceeded the precision of the definition of a "meter". So it made sense to re-define the meter according to something that was known to be a better constant.
 
russ_watters said:
Yes. It wasn't known until it was measured. But at some point, our ability to measure it exceeded the precision of the definition of a "meter". So it made sense to re-define the meter according to something that was known to be a better constant.

Ah! Thank you, I understand now, all makes sense.
 
fluidistic said:
I'm not sure I understand well. So it has been defined, but light has a real speed which certainly isn't the one defined.
That's the point, because of the way the second and the meter are defined any measurement of the speed of light will result in the defined value (but as phlegmy said the length of the meter will change).

To measure the speed of light one would basically measure the time taken for a pulse of light to travel a given distance. Now, because the second is defined by hyperfine atomic transitions (independent of the speed of light) and the meter is defined as the distance a pulse of light travels in 1/c seconds (dependent on the speed of light) when one calculates that speed of light one will always obtain the defined value.

Does that make sense?

Edit: Too slow.
 
fluidistic said:
Hi all,
According to this site : http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/, the speed of light in vacuum is 299792458 \frac{m}{s} with no uncertainty! How is that that there's no uncertainty? I like this website because it gives many physics constants with their uncertainties, but here I have to say that I'm septic.

When people talk in this world...we often use words we shouldn't use because there's a HIGH probability of it being so.

Like Proven
Certain
etc etc.
OF course we can never be 100% certain about a lot of physical things.
But we're certain beyond resonable doubt...that the speed of light remains constant. It doesn't matter if the light was shot while something was traveling, or standing still. It will still reach its destination at "C"
 
You're septic? Have you seen a doctor for that condition?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
fluidistic said:
I'm not sure I understand well. So it has been defined, but light has a real speed which certainly isn't the one defined. So has it been defined (so without uncertainty) in order to make more precise the length of a meter for example? (and I guess many other physics constants are by this way more precise). If yes, what's the meaning of what phlegmy said : measuring the speed of light? If it is already known (and perfectly known...), what's the point of measuring the speed of light?
To clarify- it is NOT the "speed of light" that has been "defined"- as you say that is a constant of nature and we cannot just "define" it to be a specific value. But we can define the length of a meter. Whereas the meter was orginally defined to be 1/1000000 (I think that's the right fraction) of the distance from the north pole to the equator, along the longitude of Paris, France, and later defined to be the length of a particular bar of metal kept in store room in Paris (the one kept in Washington, D.C. as the basis for distance units in the U.S.- yes, even the "foot", "yard" and "mile"- was copied from the one in Paris), more recently, the meter was redefined to be the specific length that makes that particular value for the speed of light correct in m/s. The length of the meter is NOT a "constant of nature", it is our creation and we are free to alter it as we please.

The speed of light as given, in m/s is exactly correct because the meter is defined so as to make it exactly correct.
 
  • #11
Your septic? Have you seen a doctor for that condition?
Sorry, I don't know why I thought this word was used to say that I was doubtful. Even in my mother tongue (the word is septique) I thought it meant doubtful, but it doesn't. How strange! Thanks for pointing that out, I will remember it.
Thanks for the input, now I realize we had to define the speed of light.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I think you meant "sceptic" - that word means doubtful. Septic means... like, nasty. Ill. Rotten.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Why does the speed of light change in different media?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Graduate Speed of Light when not in a vacuum?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Undergrad The speed of light in glass and water
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
Graduate Uncertainty in the mesurements of a meter and the speed of light
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Undergrad Does a certainty in the position imply infinite variation in speed?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
High School Meaningfulness of the speed of light
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Undergrad How was the speed of light calculated before the redefinition of the meter?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Graduate Propagation of light in a vacuum
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Graduate What is the relationship between the speed of light and the true vacuum?
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Undergrad A question about the speed of light and electromagnetism
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K