Undergrad Is the Heisenberg-Robertson Uncertainty Relation Always Consistent?

Click For Summary
The Heisenberg-Robertson Uncertainty Relation is derived from a general uncertainty principle that includes terms involving both the commutator and anticommutator of Hermitian operators. The simplification of the relation, which discards the anticommutator term, is valid only if a specific condition is met, ensuring that the discarded term is non-negative. This condition is generally satisfied because the anticommutator of two Hermitian operators yields a real expectation value. Additionally, if one operator is expressed as an imaginary unit times a Hermitian operator, the relation remains consistent, indicating that the left side of the inequality is positive semidefinite. Thus, the Heisenberg-Robertson Uncertainty Relation maintains its validity under these conditions.
DuckAmuck
Messages
238
Reaction score
40
TL;DR
Something about this is not clear.
The general uncertainty principle is derived to be:
\sigma_A^2 \sigma_B^2 \geq \left(\frac{1}{2} \langle \{A,B\} \rangle -\langle A \rangle \langle B \rangle \right)^2 + \left(\frac{1}{2i} \langle [A,B] \rangle \right)^2
Then it is often "simplified" to be:
\sigma_A^2 \sigma_B^2 \geq \left(\frac{1}{2i} \langle [A,B] \rangle \right)^2
But this simplification only works if:
\left(\frac{1}{2} \langle \{A,B\} \rangle -\langle A \rangle \langle B \rangle \right)^2 \geq 0
However is this condition always met? *
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The anticommutator of two Hermitian operators is Hermitian, hence has a real expectation value. Therefore, the term you are discarding is always positive.

If ##M## is supposed to be a Hermitian operator, then ##B = iM## certainly isn't.
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck and vanhees71
Note that also
$$\hat{C}=\frac{1}{\mathrm{i}} [\hat{A},\hat{B}]$$
is self-adjoint if ##\hat{A}## and ##\hat{B}## are self-adjoint, and thus also the somewhat weaker Heisenberg-Robertson uncertainty relation is consistent, i.e., the left-hand side of the inequality is positive semidefinite. The original stronger uncertainty relation is due to Schrödinger (if needed, I can look for the citation).
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K