Uncovering the Math Behind a Mysterious Paradox

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ramsey2879
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical Paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a recursive series defined as S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) - 4, with initial conditions S(1) = 3 and S(2) = 2. A new series N(i) is introduced, which relates to S(n) through specific equations that reveal mathematical relationships. Notably, the author highlights a paradox where altering S(2) to 12 still maintains the validity of derived equations. The discussion emphasizes the need for understanding second-order linear homogeneous recurrences and their solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recursive series and their definitions
  • Familiarity with second-order linear homogeneous recurrences
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction and proof techniques
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the methods for solving second-order linear homogeneous recurrences
  • Explore the implications of altering initial conditions in recursive sequences
  • Learn about mathematical induction and its applications in proving series properties
  • Investigate the relationship between recursive sequences and combinatorial identities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying discrete mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of recursive sequences and their paradoxes.

ramsey2879
Messages
841
Reaction score
3
I discovered a mathamatical truth that seems to have no clear logical foundation. Could anyone here explain the math behind the following?

A.Given the following recursive series:

S(1) = 3
S(2) = 2
S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) - 4

Define a new series as follows
N(i) = (S(i) + S(i+1) + 1)/2

B.Now note that for all i
1) S(i)*S(i+1) = N(i)*(N(i) + 1)/2
2) (N(i) + N(i +1) + 1)/4 = S(i+1)
3) N(i)*N(i+1)/4 = S(i+1)*(S(i+1) + 1)/2

C. A even more amazing paradox is that you can rewrite line 2 of part A as S(2) = 12, and make no other changes except to redo the math. Still B1, B2, and B3 again hold true!

What factors lurk in the background of this paradox?
Could yet another number be substituted for the numbers 2 or 12 in line 2 of part A?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know there's a straightforward procedure to solve recurrence relations of that type, right?

Second order linear homogeneous recurrences like that are of the form
S(n) = A rn + B sn
unless they degenerate; I forget how to treat them when they degenerate.


Paradox? :confused:
 
Hurkyl said:
You know there's a straightforward procedure to solve recurrence relations of that type, right?

Second order linear homogeneous recurrences like that are of the form
S(n) = A rn + B sn
unless they degenerate; I forget how to treat them when they degenerate.


Paradox? :confused:

I saw that before but I lost the book that it was in. Is the a website that explains how to do so. Don't worry about the -4 in the recursive relation of my amended post. By subtracting 1 from each S(i) term you get a series that is truly S(n) = 6*S(n-1)-S(n-2)! So I would subtract 1 from each term solve to get the series S'(n) then write [tex]S(n) = Ar^{n} + Bs^{n} + 1[/tex] where A and B are derived from the series S'(n).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
963
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K