Undergrad Research: A Valuable Asset for Grad School Applications?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the value of undergraduate research experience for graduate school applications, particularly in the context of engineering fields. Participants explore whether engaging in unpaid research during the summer is beneficial compared to traditional employment.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the value of unpaid research versus a regular job, questioning how much it will enhance their graduate school application.
  • Another participant asserts that research always looks good on a graduate school application, suggesting it demonstrates involvement and experience in the field of study.
  • Some participants argue that unpaid research shows a commitment to learning rather than financial gain, which could be viewed positively by admissions committees.
  • There is a suggestion that getting published during research could significantly enhance a candidate's profile, indicating the ability to take on challenges.
  • One participant notes that for undergraduates, merely participating in research is often sufficient merit, even if contributions are minimal.
  • A personal account highlights that undergraduate research can serve as a valuable connection between theoretical knowledge and practical application, potentially aiding in both graduate school admissions and job interviews.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that engaging in research is beneficial for graduate school applications, although there are varying opinions on the necessity of publication and the extent of contribution required to make a significant impact.

Contextual Notes

Some participants emphasize the importance of aligning research with one's field of study, while others suggest that any research experience can be valuable. There is also a recognition that the perceived merit of research may vary based on individual contributions and outcomes.

Maxwell
Messages
511
Reaction score
0
I have been given the opportunity to do research this summer. However, since I am an undergraduate, I will not be paid. I'm not going to be starving, so I don't NEED to work, but it's nice to have money.

So, if I do research this summer (and possibly the rest of the time I am an undergrad), will this look good when I apply to grad school?

I am an EE, btw. I am looking to go to grad school for a masters degree, but I will most likely go to industry after.

Will research look good on my application to graduate schools, or should I just work my normal job? How good does it look?

Thanks.

BTW - the research is in the field (or similar) that I'd like to pursue on the graduate level.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Research always looks good on a grad school application.
 
Yes. There should be no reason for it to not be a good thing.

Assuming you're going to be doing research in your field of study, yes it will look good. It shows that you have gotten involved in something you study at school, therefore gaining experience in that particular field of study.

This is different opposed to just having a job at 7-11, which shows no connection whatsoever to what you do in school. (Unless you calculate the heat transfer within hotdogs in your free time)

Another positive thing about it being not-paid is that you are volunteering to sacrifice your time to learn more about what you do. That should be a positive thing to anyone reading your application because you're not solely doing it to get paid. You are doing it because you want to learn more (otherwise you could just simply say blah and reject the offer).

There's nothing working against you here. If you can do it, I'd take up the offer unless you can get a better research position elsewhere.

The point is that there is absolutely no reason why it should work against you, it wouldn't make any sense. (Unless you failed a class or something and decided to do this instead of making it up during the summer, heh)
 
Last edited:
Research is always helpful and i think it doesn't matter in which field you do..but important fact is that you should get published i.e. you should be able to achieve something out of that...that will show recruiters ,the guy has guts and can take challenges..

And i think you should do Research in subjects you have studied,not pick up completely alien..like the developed curisioties while you did a particular course should act as driving force..
 
for an undergrad just participating in research is enough merit. an research assistants contribution is rarely big enough to warrant anything besides maybe the position of the last name on the paper.
 
Go for the research. It can provide a valuable bridge between theory and hands on practice. The research I did as an undergrad was a plus in getting into grad school and with job interviews I otherwise might not have gotten. The only scary part was having to give a presentation on the research in a follow up job interview! Plus, my name was the last one on the paper, which was a great feeling of pride years later when I found the paper in the university library. I still have a copy of the paper somewhere...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K