Understand L'Hospital's Rule: Strategies & Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter maceng7
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of L'Hospital's Rule in evaluating limits that result in indeterminate forms, specifically focusing on strategies for determining which function to place in the numerator or denominator. Participants are exploring the nuances of handling limits that yield forms such as 0/0 or ∞/∞.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the lack of a universal strategy for choosing the denominator in L'Hospital's Rule applications, with some suggesting that better cancellation of factors may guide the choice. Questions arise about whether the simplicity of derivatives influences the placement of functions in the numerator or denominator.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the application of L'Hospital's Rule. There is a recognition that algebraic manipulation may be necessary to achieve the correct form for applying the rule, and some participants are seeking clarification on specific examples and steps taken in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the importance of correctly identifying the form of the limit before applying L'Hospital's Rule, with some participants noting that limits of the form 0/∞ do not require the rule and can be evaluated directly. The original poster is encouraged to provide specific examples to facilitate more targeted assistance.

maceng7
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hey I'm doing indeterminate products and using l'hospital's rule and does anyone have a strategy that works well in determining which function you put as your denominator? Obviously there isn't one strategy that works 100% but I'm just wondering if anyone knows a good way of determining this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


maceng7 said:
Hey I'm doing indeterminate products and using l'hospital's rule and does anyone have a strategy that works well in determining which function you put as your denominator? Obviously there isn't one strategy that works 100% but I'm just wondering if anyone knows a good way of determining this? Thanks.
You're right, there is no general rule.

Whatever gives better cancellation of offending factors is often a good choice.
 


What's a good way to start then? Putting the function whose derivative is simpler on the bottom or top or does it even matter?
 
Why don't you provide us with an problem that you are having difficulty with. As you mentioned, there is no one way of getting your indeterminate form fit 0/0 or infinty/infinity. So, giving us an example may allow us to help you.
 


maceng7 said:
What's a good way to start then? Putting the function whose derivative is simpler on the bottom or top or does it even matter?
It's not always that simple, (Pardon the joke.) although that does often work.

I have seen cases where the derivative of top or bottom gets more complicated than the original, but the result affords just the right amount of cancelling with the other derivative so that the overall result is nicely behaved.
--- no example off the top of my head.​
 
Bashyboy said:
Why don't you provide us with an problem that you are having difficulty with. As you mentioned, there is no one way of getting your indeterminate form fit 0/0 or infinty/infinity. So, giving us an example may allow us to help you.

Alright I think I did this one correctly

lim x--> 1+ ln(x) * tan(∏x/2)

I found this limit by putting ln(x) in the numerator and tan(∏x/2) in the denominator. I used l'hospital's rule once and found it to be 1/∞ so my answer is 0. Is this correct?
 
You can only use L'Hospital's Rule when it is 0/0 or infinity/infinity. If it is 0/infinity, you have to do some algebra to rewrite it in a form that is 0/0 or infinity/infinity.
 
maceng7 said:
Alright I think I did this one correctly

lim x--> 1+ ln(x) * tan(∏x/2)

I found this limit by putting ln(x) in the numerator and tan(∏x/2) in the denominator. I used l'hospital's rule once and found it to be 1/∞ so my answer is 0. Is this correct?
Please show your steps.
 
What's the statement of the original problem? Is it [itex]lim_{x \rightarrow 1^+}~ ln(x) \cdot \tan( \frac{\pi x}{2})[/itex]? I ask, because you can't just arbitrarily chose which function you want to put in the numerator and which one will go in the denominator. You have to use algebraic manipulation to put it in the form you want.
 
  • #10
maceng7 said:
Alright I think I did this one correctly

lim x--> 1+ ln(x) * tan(∏x/2)

I found this limit by putting ln(x) in the numerator and tan(∏x/2) in the denominator. I used l'hospital's rule once and found it to be 1/∞ so my answer is 0. Is this correct?

No, it's not right. How exactly did you do that? You don't just 'put something into the denominator'. a*b is not equal to a/b, it is equal to a/(1/b).
 
  • #11
It appears we are all giving the same advice. @maceng7 is what we are saying making any sense?

Let a = ln(x) and b = tan(pix/2). As dick mentioned, a*b is entirely different from a/b. By putting the b in the denominator, you've created a new function, entirely different from the original; and when you evaluate the limit of a/b, the result you get tells you nothing of the limit for a*b. This is true, because a*b and a/b are different functions.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Yosty22 said:
You can only use L'Hospital's Rule when it is 0/0 or infinity/infinity. If it is 0/infinity, you have to do some algebra to rewrite it in a form that is 0/0 or infinity/infinity.

NO: if it is 0/∞ you are done: the answer = 0 and there is no need for l'Hospital's rule.
 
  • #13
Ray Vickson said:
NO: if it is 0/∞ you are done: the answer = 0 and there is no need for l'Hospital's rule.
But as Dick point's out, the limit is not zero so ...Let's wait to hear back from OP .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K