Understand Magnetic Circuits: Energy Requirements Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter dhruv.tara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Magnetic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the fundamental differences between electrical and magnetic circuits, specifically focusing on energy requirements. In magnetic circuits, energy is only needed to establish magnetic flux, as there is no energy loss due to reluctance, unlike in electrical circuits where energy is continuously required to maintain current flow. The analogy between electric current and magnetic flux is emphasized, highlighting that magnetic flux does not involve the movement of particles carrying kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrical circuit concepts
  • Familiarity with magnetic circuit principles
  • Knowledge of energy conservation in physical systems
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetic theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetic reluctance and its impact on circuit efficiency
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic flux and electric current in detail
  • Study energy conservation laws in electromagnetic systems
  • Learn about applications of magnetic circuits in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists, and anyone interested in the principles of magnetic circuits and their applications in technology.

dhruv.tara
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
While reading my text about the differences between the electrical and magnetic circuits, there was one point that I couldn't justify myself with.

... There is no waste of energy due to reluctance in a magnetic circuit and therefore energy is required only to create a magnetic flux but not to maintain it, unlike the electrical circuits.

Can anyone explain me or let me have a better picture of this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Electric current is the directed motion of charges inside the conductors. Magnetic flux, the analogue of the electric current for magnetic circuits does not represent a flux of particles carrying some kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K