Understanding 20 ÷ 2(1+1)= ? - Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter quietrain
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the expression 20 ÷ 2(1+1) and the interpretation of its value. Participants are exploring the order of operations and how different interpretations can lead to varying results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate the expression in two different ways, questioning whether the result is 20 or 5. Some participants suggest that the notation may lead to ambiguity, prompting a discussion on how to properly express the mathematical operation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the expression's interpretation, with some participants providing guidance on notation and order of operations. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach, and the discussion has been noted to have been previously addressed in other threads.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of notation in mathematical expressions and how it can affect interpretation. There is mention of previous discussions on similar topics, indicating a broader context for the problem.

quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



what is 20 ÷ 2(1+1)= ?


The Attempt at a Solution



is it 20 ÷ 2 x (2) = 10 x (2) = 20?

or 20 ÷ 2(2) = 20 ÷ 4 = 5 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ah thank you , will give it a look
 
Your first way, giving 20, is correct, although the best way to write the expression is not with that kind of Division operation symbol. I would prefer to write it this way, if you could go from text display into proper typesetting yourself:

(20/2)*(1+1)

The first Division is done first, and the result is multiplied by "one plus one". (That also means that the original shown expression in the grouping symbols, "1+1" would be done before doing the first Division).
 
symbolipoint said:
Your first way, giving 20, is correct, although the best way to write the expression is not with that kind of Division operation symbol. I would prefer to write it this way, if you could go from text display into proper typesetting yourself:

(20/2)*(1+1)

The first Division is done first, and the result is multiplied by "one plus one". (That also means that the original shown expression in the grouping symbols, "1+1" would be done before doing the first Division).

hmm but shouldn't the 2 be a like a factor of (1+1)?

so by right it should be seen as 20 ÷ [2(1+1)] = 5

thats the reason why we write it as 2(1+1) and not 2 x (1+1) right? although i admit it is a shorthand notation
 
It was beaten to death, please refer to the old thread. Math is clear here, notation pretends to be ambiguous.

Topic locked.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K