Understanding a question about a finite energy well when E < 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter drop_out_kid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Finite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the complexities of solving quantum mechanics problems related to finite potential wells, specifically when the energy (E) is less than zero. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the relationship between the variables alpha and k, which are linked to energy levels. The conversation highlights that while there can be valid energy solutions for both variables, they do not always coexist, raising questions about the existence of combined solutions. Additionally, the impact of potential barriers on wave amplitude and wavenumber is addressed, underscoring the intricacies of energy transfer in quantum systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with finite potential well concepts
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their properties
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the 1-D finite potential well on Wikipedia for foundational knowledge
  • Explore the concept of bound states in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between wave amplitude and energy in potential barriers
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of energy levels in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum physics, particularly those seeking to understand finite potential wells and the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics.

drop_out_kid
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
So I didn't get how professor make wave function to be odd and even and then magically solved them,..
Relevant Equations
None, it's non-analytical.
1650403916840.png


So
1650403960714.png
,solution only fit for one of them , the other one is not zero , how can that be solution??
1650404029135.png


I am pretty new to quantum physics..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hutchphd said:
This is not easy nor is it simple. But is is useful. NYou might take a look at the 1-D section of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_potential_well

as a start.Tell us exactly
  1. the question you are trying to answer and
  2. how you intend to answer it.
So, it is trying to solve this eqs
1650406530423.png
right, there are two variables , alpha and k, all related to E , so when this stands, there will be a valid E. the question is , the valid E for both of them are not stand together, how can there be "combined solutions"?
 

Attachments

  • 1650406212736.png
    1650406212736.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 131
hutchphd said:
This is not easy nor is it simple. But is is useful. NYou might take a look at the 1-D section of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_potential_well

as a start.Tell us exactly
  1. the question you are trying to answer and
  2. how you intend to answer it.
Also, may I ask that, if potential V0 > 0 and it's a constant, so when the particle with E > V0 pass this potential barrier, the wave amplitude doesn't change but the wavenumber decrease right(Some energy convert to potential energy?) and where the energy transfer to?
 
hutchphd said:
This is not easy nor is it simple. But is is useful. NYou might take a look at the 1-D section of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_potential_well

as a start.Tell us exactly
  1. the question you are trying to answer and
  2. how you intend to answer it.
1650407066650.png
let me say from this. does the particle in the finite well must have a integer number of wavelengths?
 
In one dimension there is always at least one bound state for any finite square well (and it will be the lowest symmetric state) . There may be many more depending upon the depth and width of the well.

You are trying to learn a big chunk of quantum in one bite here!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K