Understanding a Single Transistor Flyback Transformer Driver?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the operation of a single transistor flyback transformer driver, highlighting why the transistor eventually shuts off despite a constant positive DC voltage at the base. Initially, positive feedback from the transformer amplifies the base drive, increasing collector current until saturation occurs. When the collector current reaches its peak, the magnetic flux stabilizes, causing a drop in base voltage and current, which leads to the transistor turning off. The cycle can then repeat once the energy dissipates into the load and the secondary diode turns off. Overall, the complexity of these circuits is acknowledged, with modern designs favoring IC-based controls for efficiency.
doggy
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Circuit problem in Flyback Transformer Driver
I've been watching a few analyses of CRT flyback transformer drivers and can't understand why the transistor would shut off. To my naive perspective, it appears that the transistor should never shut off due to the positive DC voltage applied constantly to the base. I'm aware that this isn't the case since transformers need changing currents to induce currents in their other coils. I'm aware that the coils have inductance which dampens current buildup and charges the inductor core, but I can't wrap my hear around the transistor region.

(Reference: https://www.kynix.com/Blog/The-Complete-Explanation-of-a-Flyback-Transformer.html)

Circuit Diagram:
MIn5m.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Notice that the transistor is only just biased on.
You do not indicate the polarity of the primary and feedback windings.
At some frequency, the feedback loop through the transformer will have a gain greater than one. The turn on transient, or any noise, will be amplified until the circuit oscillates continuously.
 
  • Like
Likes jsgruszynski and DaveE
Try searching google for "self oscillating flyback power supplies". You'll get a bunch of more realistic versions (also more complicated). I thought https://www.electroschematics.com/diy-rcc-smps-circuits/ had a good description.

I think the idea is that the base initially has positive feedback to turn on, but eventually the base drive current is limited so at some point the collector current grows too large to keep the transistor saturated. The collector voltage then rises and causes a decrease in base drive, so now there's positive feedback to turn it off. You will get a big voltage imposed on the collector when the magnetizing current starts to flow in the secondary winding (the flyback part). This will act to turn the transistor off via the base winding. When the transformer energy has dissipated into the load the secondary diode turns off and the cycle can repeat starting from the small resistor bias. In practice these circuits are more complicated than they look though.

I thought the link you provided was a good introduction to more modern flyback SMPS design. This sort of self-oscillating version has been long since replaced with IC based control circuits. Frankly, these self oscillating designs are a really poor way of driving switching devices efficiently.
 
The DC bias provided by R1 & R2 starts transistor Q1 conducting as soon as power is applied. Current begins flowing through the transistor and the Collector winding L1, which induces a voltage in the Feedback winding L2. This induced voltage on L2 translates a positive voltage to the base of the transistor, forcing the transistor to increase current flow. As the collector current flow increases, the voltage coupled through the transformer saturates the Base.

As the collector turns full on, the transistor output drops to zero. The current has been increasing through the transformer. When the collector current reaches maximum and/or the coil becomes saturated, magnetic flux between the windings, L1 to L2, begins to stop changing. The base voltage and current drop sharply, and than shutting off the Collector current.
 
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top