Understanding a0 in Paper: Page 9 of 1405.1283v1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 69911e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the term a0 as defined in the paper "1405.1283v1," specifically on page 9, where a0 is described as a fixed length determined experimentally, expressed mathematically as a0 ≡ be−∆/2. The conversation highlights the importance of dimensionless arguments in normalization processes, particularly in particle physics, where a length scale is introduced to relate to the Casimir effect. The comparison to Zee's "QFT in a Nutshell" further clarifies the concept by referencing the throat radius where Casimir energy vanishes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with the Casimir effect
  • Knowledge of normalization techniques in physics
  • Ability to interpret mathematical expressions in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Casimir effect in detail, particularly its implications in quantum field theory
  • Read Zee's "QFT in a Nutshell," focusing on chapter 1.8
  • Explore experimental methods for determining fixed lengths in particle physics
  • Investigate the relationship between dimensionless quantities and physical interpretations in theoretical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, researchers studying the Casimir effect, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of normalization in theoretical physics.

69911e
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Can someone help me understand exactly what a0 is in the following paper (page9)?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.1283v1.pdf
"where a0 ≡ be−∆/2 (60) is a fixed length that can only be determined by experiment."

Found it in this article which has a better diagram:
http://www.kicc.cam.ac.uk/news/wormholes-negative-energy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The author gives the interpretation of it just below your equation. I haven't read the paper, but in normalizations where you encounter logs the argument of the log should be dimensionless. In particle physics this often means introducing a certain mass scale, here it means introducing a length-scale (which is the inverse thing, basically) which turns out to be the throat radius for which the Casimir energy vanishes.

Maybe it helps to compare it with Zee's QFT in a Nutshell, chapter 1.8 about the Casimir effect; there, a length scale d appears, being the distance between the plates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
404
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
473
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K