Understanding Lorentz Group Generators: Derivation & Step in Eq 15

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of Lorentz generators, specifically addressing the equation 15 from the paper available at arXiv:1103.0156. The equation states that \(\omega^{\alpha}_{\beta} = g^{\alpha\mu}\omega_{\mu\beta}\), where \(g^{\alpha\mu}\) is the metric tensor that raises indices on tensors. It is clarified that \(g^{\alpha\mu}\) is not the identity matrix, and in inertial coordinates, the components of the metric tensor are defined as \(g^{tt} = +1\) and \(g^{xx} = g^{yy} = g^{zz} = -1\), leading to the conclusion that \(\omega^{\alpha}_{\beta} = \pm \omega_{\alpha \beta}\) in these coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the metric tensor in general relativity
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Basic concepts of inertial coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the metric tensor in general relativity
  • Learn about Lorentz transformations and their applications
  • Explore tensor calculus and its relevance in physics
  • Review the derivation of Lorentz generators in more detail
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone studying general relativity or tensor calculus will benefit from this discussion.

VVS
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am trying to understand the derivation of the Lorentz generators but I am stuck.
I am reading this paper at the moment: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.0156.pdf
I don't understand the following step in equation 15 on page 3:
\omega^{\alpha}_{\beta}=g^{\alpha\mu}\omega_{\mu\beta}
I don't understand how this can be true. I mean g is not the identity matrix.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VVS said:
Hi,
I am trying to understand the derivation of the Lorentz generators but I am stuck.
I am reading this paper at the moment: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.0156.pdf
I don't understand the following step in equation 15 on page 3:
\omega^{\alpha}_{\beta}=g^{\alpha\mu}\omega_{\mu\beta}
I don't understand how this can be true. I mean g is not the identity matrix.

That's sort of by definition. g^{\alpha \mu} raises indices on a tensor and g_{\alpha \mu} lowers them. Note that in general \omega^{\alpha}_\beta \neq \omega_{\alpha \beta}

In inertial coordinates, g^{t t} = +1, g^{x x} = g^{y y} = g^{z z} = -1, and g^{i j} = 0 if i \neq j. So in inertial coordinates, \omega^{\alpha}_{\beta} = \pm \omega_{\alpha \beta}.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
15K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K