Understanding Acceleration in a Ball Thrown Upward

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the acceleration and velocity of a ball thrown upward, including the graphical representation of these concepts. Participants explore the implications of acceleration being constant and negative, the relationship between kinetic and potential energy, and the interpretation of velocity as positive or negative during the ball's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the acceleration of the ball is constant and should be represented as a horizontal line at -g on a graph, questioning why it is drawn below zero.
  • Others argue that drawing the acceleration at -g makes sense because it reflects the downward acceleration due to gravity, while +g would imply an upward acceleration, which is not the case.
  • Participants discuss the velocity of the ball, noting that it starts at maximum positive velocity, becomes zero at maximum height, and then becomes negative as it falls back down.
  • There is a mention of conservation of energy, with some participants suggesting that kinetic energy transforms into potential energy and vice versa during the ball's flight.
  • One participant expresses confusion about why the acceleration graph starts at -g and seeks clarification on the relationship between acceleration and height.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the choice of positive or negative direction in calculations is arbitrary, as long as it is consistent throughout.
  • Some participants provide formulas related to velocity and acceleration, discussing their relevance to the motion of the ball.
  • There is a clarification that negative velocity indicates a decrease in height, and that kinetic energy remains positive regardless of the direction of velocity due to the squaring of the velocity term.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the representation of acceleration and velocity, as well as the interpretation of energy conservation. There is no clear consensus, and multiple competing views remain on these topics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need for specific formulas and the importance of understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy, indicating that there may be unresolved mathematical steps or assumptions in their discussions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in the physics of motion, particularly those looking to understand the concepts of acceleration, velocity, and energy conservation in the context of projectile motion.

Kork
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I want to draw a graph for a ball thrown directly up in the air.

I know that when I throw the ball up in the air the acceleration will be constant. So if I draw a graph with the acceleration as function of time, I would get a horizontal line. I have read that the line should be drawn below zero at the y-axis, but why? And it cuts the y-axis at -g, what is the explanation to that? Why do I need to look at the acceleration as g?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kork!
I have read that the line should be drawn below zero at the y-axis, but why? And it cuts the y-axis at -g, what is the explanation to that?
If upwards in real life corresponds to upwards on the y-axis, then it would make sense to draw the line at -g. +g would mean the ball was accelerated (attracted) upwards, which it clearly isn't.
Why do I need to look at the acceleration as g?
g is the standard gravity, the acceleration (downwards) of any object near the surface of the Earth.
 
By the way. I have also made a graph with velocity as a function of time for the ball thrown up in the air. The grapfh starts at max velocity and decreases and crosses the x-axis (time). What can I say about the conservation of energy here? The point that the velocity is negative when the ball falls down confuses me.
 
Thank you DennisN,

So if I start at -g, then it makes sense because I start from low to height, or how?
 
What can I say about the conservation of energy here?
Do you know about kinetic energy and potential energy?
 
So if I start at -g, then it makes sense because I start from low to height, or how?
I'm not sure what you mean. The acceleration will always be -g. The velocity will change; try to think about how it will change. What happens when you throw it up (initial velocity), what happens at the max height, what happens when the ball falls downwards, and what happens when the ball hits the ground? (I know the answers, I just want you to think about it, and I will help you :smile:). And btw, do you have any formulas, or is it just the basic view you're after?
 
Yes, I know what potential and kinetic energy is.
 
DennisN said:
I'm not sure what you mean. The acceleration will always be -g. The velocity will change; try to think about how it will change. What happens when you throw it up (initial velocity), what happens at the max height, what happens when the ball falls downwards, and what happens when the ball hits the ground? (I know the answers, I just want you to think about it, and I will help you :smile:). And btw, do you have any formulas, or is it just the basic view you're after?


When I throw it up the velocity will be at it's maximum and it will be positiv. In max height the velocity is 0. Downwards the ball will have the same value of velocity as when it came upwards, just negative. When it hits the ground, then all the kinetic energy becomes potential?

There is so many formulas and i don't know which ones i should use to get the "picture".
 
Im still not sure why it starts at -g, when I draw the a-t graph.
 
  • #10
Du er svensk :)
 
  • #11
Ja, jag är svensk! :smile: Vad är du? Norsk, dansk, eller? We have to use English, though, that's the forum rules :frown:.
Yes, I know what potential and kinetic energy is.
Great!
Let's focus on velocity first, so we don't mix it up and confuse ourselves. When we have gotten the velocity right, the rest will follow more easy. I have to check what you've written, please hang on, will you?
 
  • #12
Im danish :)

Sure I will hang on, I have confused myself completely.
 
  • #13
Up or down, + or -, it doesn't matter which you choose as long as you stick to it throughout the calculations.

If you were considering dropping a ball off a tower then you might possibly choose down to be positive, in which case the acceleration would be g and the distances 'fallen' would be positive. You get the same numerical answer either way and you just need to interpret that answer to fit the physical reality.
 
  • #14
When I throw it up the velocity will be at it's maximum and it will be positiv. In max height the velocity is 0. Downwards the ball will have the same value of velocity as when it came upwards, just negative. When it hits the ground, then all the kinetic energy becomes potential?

Very good, almost correct. (let's skip what happens when the ball hits the ground, it's not important at this stage). There is a formula for velocity and acceleration (I don't remember the name in English, final velocity, maybe);

v = v0+a*t

where

v is the velocity
v0 is the initial velocity
a is the acceleration (that is, a=-g)
t is the time

Do you recognize this? This will yield that v = v0-g*t.
 
  • #15
If you are confused, don't hesitate to ask questions. Hint: The solution to the energy conservation question lies in the formulas for kinetic energy (depends on velocity) and potential energy (depends on height). According to the energy conservation principle the total energy during the throw/fall will be conserved, i.e. Etotal = Ekinetic + Epotential = constant.

What will happen is that

0. Before the throw, the kinetic energy and potential energy is 0 (if we define the height as 0 at your hand).
1. When you throw the ball, you give it max kinetic energy (initial velocity).
2. This kinetic energy will gradually be transformed to potential energy.
3. At max height, the potential energy will be max and the kinetic energy 0.
4. Then, gradually the potential energy will be transformed back to kinetic energy.
(5). (When the ball hits the ground, we can say that the kinetic energy will "dissipate" during the ground collision, but this doesn't really matter in this example).

Note: All this is actually only true from the time the ball leaves your hand until it falls back into your hand again. If it falls to the ground instead, the potential energy will be a little less than before.

Was this any help?
 
  • #16
Hi again, Kork. I reread what you wrote before:
The point that the velocity is negative when the ball falls down confuses me.
Try not to be confused about that, it is correct; the velocity changes direction. Going up means positive velocity, going down means negative velocity. And when you put a negative velocity into the formula for kinetic energy, it won't matter, the velocity will be squared (v*v), which will result in a positive kinetic energy.

And what you said before about the velocity:
When I throw it up the velocity will be at it's maximum and it will be positiv. In max height the velocity is 0. Downwards the ball will have the same value of velocity as when it came upwards, just negative.
is correct.
 
  • #17
Negative velocity just means you are subtracting a distance every second (i.e. the height is getting less)
 
  • #18
Thank you guys very much. This has helped a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K