Understanding Ansatz in Quantum Mechanics: Types and Applications

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
An ansatz in quantum mechanics refers to an educated guess used to simplify complex problems, often leading to solutions of the Schrödinger equation. It is not necessarily the definitive solution but can help identify potential solutions. In the two-body problem, for example, assuming a specific form for the wavefunction can yield useful results. The ansatz can either provide a general solution through linear combinations of independent solutions or focus on a specific form that meets the problem's requirements. Understanding the role of ansatz is crucial for solving quantum mechanical equations effectively.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
What is an "ansatz?"

I am reading a quantum mechanics textbook, and they keep talking about different kinds of ansatz's - most commonly, separation ansatz's. But I thought that an ansatz was nothing more than an educated guess! If you show that your ansatz is *a* solution to the Schrodinger equation, do you then know that it is *the* solution?

For example, in the two-body problem in quantum mechanics, how can you assume that \psi(\mathbf{x}_{cm}) = e^{i \mathbf{k}_{cm} \cdot \mathbf{x}_{cm}} is the solution to H_{cm} \psi_{cm} = E_{cm} \psi_{cm}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, basically Ansatz is a fancy word for (educated) guess. So at least it can help you find a solution. Then usually we have one of two options:
* The Ansatz gives the general solution. For example, if we have a second order differential equation and plugging in \psi = e^{\lambda x} gives a quadratic equation in \lambda with solutions \lambda_\pm we have two linearly indpendent solutions e^{\lambda_\pm x}. From the theory of differential equations we know that the most general solution is a linear combination of those two.

or

* The solutions of that form are all we are interested in. For example, if you know that any wavefunction can be written as a linear combination of stationary states times an evolution factor (exp(...t)) we can safely suppose that the wavefunction is of the form X(x) T(t) because we basically only want to know what X(x) can be.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K