I Understanding Classical Mechanics: Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
In classical mechanics, acceleration can be determined from coordinates and velocities due to the relationship defined by the equations of motion, assuming the generalized force depends solely on these variables. The discussion highlights that this dependency is a fundamental aspect of classical mechanics, enabling the calculation of acceleration without needing additional information at a single point in time. Clarification is provided that the assumption about the generalized force is crucial for this determination. The conversation also references a related question about uniquely defined accelerations, emphasizing the importance of understanding these foundational concepts. Overall, the discussion aims to clarify the reasoning behind the relationship between coordinates, velocities, and acceleration in classical mechanics.
Physicsphysics
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
I'm reading once again through Landau-Lifchitz and I am stuck on the first page! I can't wrap my head around why we only need to define the coordinates and velocities to determine the acceleration? Surely if we only know those two in a single point in time, that's not enough to determine an acceleration? What am I missing here? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the equations of motion with given ##q## and ##\dot{q}## you get ##\ddot{q}##. Of course you need the assumption that the (generalized) force depends only on ##q## and ##\dot{q}## as usual in classical mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes Physicsphysics
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top