Understanding Classical Torque

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BBRadiation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of torque, particularly in the context of mechanical advantage and its implications in rotational motion. Participants explore the reasoning behind why applying force farther from a rotational axis makes it easier to rotate an object, such as a door.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the reasoning behind torque and its relationship to force and distance from the hinge of a door.
  • Another participant suggests that applying force closer to the hinge requires more force per unit distance moved, while applying force farther away requires less force per unit distance.
  • Several participants mention the concept of mechanical advantage, with references to levers and crowbars as practical examples.
  • One participant questions the underlying reasons for mechanical advantage, suggesting that there may not be a definitive "why" in scientific terms.
  • Another participant points to the conservation of energy as a potential explanation for why mechanical advantage occurs.
  • Discussion includes a mathematical perspective on torque as a product of force and distance, and how it relates to work done in rotational systems.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for a physical intuitive explanation rather than a purely mathematical one.
  • Another participant illustrates the relationship between work, force, and distance in the context of lifting heavy objects with a crowbar.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of torque and mechanical advantage, with no consensus reached on a singular explanation for why mechanical advantage occurs. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing ideas presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference concepts such as conservation of energy and the mathematical formulation of torque, but there are limitations in the clarity of assumptions and definitions used in the discussion.

BBRadiation
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am having a difficult time understanding the reasoning behind torque. From a textbook I read,

"A doorknob is located as far as possible from the doors hinge line for a good reason. If you want to open a heavy door, you must certainly apply a force; that alone, however, is not enough. If you apply your force nearer to the hinge line than the knoe, or at any angle other than 90, to the plane of the door, you must use a greater force to move the door than if you apply the force at the knob and perpendicular to the door's plane."

However, why is it that it's easier to rotate a door when you are farther from the rotational axis? You are still moving the same amount of mass. Of course, I know that torque = r x F and thus increasing r decreases F if you are to maintain the same torque. But why is this true? What property of the object rotating explains this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that although you are moving the same mass(the door) from both positions, when you are closer to the hinge you have to move that mass over a shorter distance, more force per inch. When farther away you have to move the same mass but over a greater distance, so it takes less force per inch, making it easier.
 
russ_watters said:
It's mechanical advantage via a lever: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lever

Right, I know that. But why does mechanical advantage occur is what I am trying to get at.
 
I'm not sure there is a "why" (there typically isn't, in science) other than if it didn't, there'd be unbalanced forces and no conservation of energy.
 
There is derivation on this page. Rigid Body Dynamics. It derives torque as consequence of Newton's Second Law. Maybe it will help.
 
I think he is asking for a physical intuitive explantion and not a vector analysis type of explanation.
I think you have to go back to elementary science where torque is called moment, and even before that, it is called turning effect.
Sure you can apply a force anywhere, but it is not the same effect if you change your point of application.
That is why there is such a thing called leverage, or mechanical advantage. As in a crowbar, you can carry an elephant using your pinkie, provided you have a sufficiently long rod.
;)
ps One possible explanation that why this mechanical advantage has to occur is : the conservation of energy.
 
quantum123 said:
I think he is asking for a physical intuitive explantion and not a vector analysis type of explanation.
I think you have to go back to elementary science where torque is called moment, and even before that, it is called turning effect.
Sure you can apply a force anywhere, but it is not the same effect if you change your point of application.
That is why there is such a thing called leverage, or mechanical advantage. As in a crowbar, you can carry an elephant using your pinkie, provided you have a sufficiently long rod.
;)
ps One possible explanation that why this mechanical advantage has to occur is : the conservation of energy.

Yeah, I am looking for the physical intuitive explanation. Could you possibly expand on the idea of conversation of energy as a reason for mechanical advantage?

Thanks
 
A torque is in units of force times distance, more precisely F x r (cross product).
So you can increase torque by increasing the force or increasing the lateral distance.

It helps to think of torque in terms of coupled forces. I.e. for 1 Newton-meter apply half a Newton of force at two points, equally spaced 1 meter from an axis (like turning a 1m radius steering wheel.)

If you need more elaboration consider how work is done e.g. force times distance.

Torque is the generalized force associated with rotation so angular work is done by torque times angle (in radians).

Thinking then in terms of resolving a rotationally applied force, since the distance a point travels during a rotation is angle times radius:
[tex]s = r\cdot \theta[/tex]
Work is then:
[tex]F \cdot s = F\cdot r \cdot \theta = \tau \cdot \theta[/tex]

So force times radius is a natural angular force to give the same amount of work done and that is torque.

That is for magnitudes but once you understand that you can work with the vector form.

It pays to work through all the usual linear formulas converting them to angular form.
work = force times distance (above)
force is time rate of change of momentum (torque is time rate of change of angular momentum)
force = mass times acceleration (torque = moment of inertia times angular acceleration.)
 
  • #10
Think of a crowbar, the work you do (energy input) = the increase in PE of the stone you lift.
Large force X small distance = small load X large distance.
You need to move a lot just to move the heavy stone a little, because energy is conserved.

This is just one explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K