Understanding Conic Sections: Ellipse, Parabola, and Hyperbola Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter PotatoSalad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conic sections
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the classification of conic sections based on the equation Ax^2 + Cy^2 + Dx + Ey + F = 0. It establishes that when AC > 0, the result is an ellipse; when AC = 0, it yields a parabola; and when AC < 0, a hyperbola is formed, barring certain degenerate cases. The conversation emphasizes the importance of completing the square to analyze these cases effectively, particularly when A and C are non-zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conic sections and their properties
  • Familiarity with the equation of a conic section
  • Knowledge of completing the square technique
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of conic sections from the general quadratic equation
  • Learn about degenerate cases of conic sections and their implications
  • Explore graphical representations of ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas
  • Investigate the applications of conic sections in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching conic sections, and anyone interested in the geometric properties and applications of quadratic equations.

PotatoSalad
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Here's the question:
Consider the equation:
Ax^2+Cy^2+Dx+Ey+F=0

Consider the cases AC>0, AC=0 and AC<0 and show that they lead to an ellipse, parabola and hyperbola respectively, except for certain degenerate cases. Discuss these degenerate cases and the curves that arise from them


Don't really know where to start. I can 'prove' it by doing examples but that is not sufficient. Can somebody get me started on answering this question please?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Complete the squares, and rearrange in the cases where neither A or C are zero.
Then tackle the cases where either A, C or both are zero.
 
Ok... so I complete the square to:
EDIT: I suck at using LaTeX. Give me a minute...

Ok here it is:
http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/4413/eqnyo7.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the case of non-zero A and C, it is simpler to do it the following way, in order to not get into the silly trouble of square-rooting negative numbers:
A(x+G)^{2}+C(y+H)^{2}=I, G=\frac{D}{2A}, H=\frac{E}{2C}, I=AG^{2}+CH^{2}-F
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K