Understanding Conservative Forces in Physics

AI Thread Summary
A conservative force is defined by the work it does depending solely on the initial and final positions of an object, not the path taken. Gravity is a prime example of a conservative force, as the work done remains constant regardless of the trajectory, while friction is non-conservative because it varies with the path. The relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) is crucial, as they together represent the total mechanical energy of a system, which remains constant in the absence of external forces. Understanding these concepts helps clarify why potential energy is useful in calculations involving conservative forces. Mastering these principles is essential for grasping the fundamentals of physics.
livelife92
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hiee...
ther r sum sentences in ma textbk dat i ve neva been able 2 understand...:confused:

"a force is said to be conservative if wrk done by the force in a moving body depends only in the initial n final positions of the body during the motion"
does it mean dat a force is conservative if wrk depends on displacement?...bt thn why IS it said 2 b CONSERVATIVE??

""this is always true when anybody is moved against the force of gravity ...weight is thus a CONSERVATIVE force""?!?:mad:

"KE and PE 2gthr make up the total mech E of an object'
...i knw dat...bt
'it remains constant if thr r no external forces 2 wrk on the body anddddd "THE INTERNAL FORCES ARE CONSERVATIVE""also thr shld be no sudden changes in the motion of d body:rolleyes:

pleasezzz help me! i m jus nt been able 2 undrstand this...the tchr. who teaches us phy. seems to mug up the text n throw up in frnt of us...she is totally confused when i ask this...
please help me undrstnd this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction is an example of a non-conservative force... If you take a block of wood on a table and move it from position A to position B... the work done by friction depends on the path taken... do you go in a straight line... do you go in a curve... the work done by friction will be different depending on the path taken...

But for gravity the path doesn't matter... just the initial and final heights.

When you have a conservative force, you can have a "potential" energy... like gravitational potential energy... elastic potential energy... electric potential energy they make things easier because you don't have to deal with those forces... just energies...
 
Last edited:
You seem to have a number of problems- extreme difficulty in writing a coherent sentence, for one, inability to understand that the "tutorial section" is not for questions- most people do not go to the tutorial section to answer questions!

I'm moving this to the homework thread where I hope you will get more responses.
 
ok sry...i wasnt careful while posting...newayz..i needed an ans 2 my Q..
 
livelife92 said:
ther r sum sentences in ma textbk dat i ve neva been able 2 understand...:confused:
ther r sum sentences in ur Q dat i can't undestnd eidr, prhps u cld try puttin in sum vowels 4 exmpl n use sum commas r dots r sumthn

livelife92 said:
"a force is said to be conservative if wrk done by the force in a moving body depends only in the initial n final positions of the body during the motion"
does it mean dat a force is conservative if wrk depends on displacement?
No... or yes!
It depends on the initial and final position, so the total displacement. It does not depend on the path taken. For example, gravitational force is conservative, because if I lift an object straight up by 1 meter, or I move it all over the world, to the center of the Earth and finally hold it 1 meter higher than I started, in both cases the work done will be m g (assuming g to be constant). On the other hand, friction is non-conservative. If I move from A to B in a straight line, I will lose less energy in friction then when I move in a lot of tiny circles, for example.

livelife92 said:
"KE and PE 2gthr make up the total mech E of an object'
'it remains constant if thr r no external forces 2 wrk on the body anddddd "THE INTERNAL FORCES ARE CONSERVATIVE""
Yeah, so actually PE is just a bookkeeping tool that allows us to (ab)use conservation of energy when conservative forces are at work.
 
thx!
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

A and C collide with B inbetween; AB elastic, BC inelastic
Replies
27
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top