Understanding Conservative Forces in Physics

AI Thread Summary
A conservative force is defined by the work it does depending solely on the initial and final positions of an object, not the path taken. Gravity is a prime example of a conservative force, as the work done remains constant regardless of the trajectory, while friction is non-conservative because it varies with the path. The relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) is crucial, as they together represent the total mechanical energy of a system, which remains constant in the absence of external forces. Understanding these concepts helps clarify why potential energy is useful in calculations involving conservative forces. Mastering these principles is essential for grasping the fundamentals of physics.
livelife92
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hiee...
ther r sum sentences in ma textbk dat i ve neva been able 2 understand...:confused:

"a force is said to be conservative if wrk done by the force in a moving body depends only in the initial n final positions of the body during the motion"
does it mean dat a force is conservative if wrk depends on displacement?...bt thn why IS it said 2 b CONSERVATIVE??

""this is always true when anybody is moved against the force of gravity ...weight is thus a CONSERVATIVE force""?!?:mad:

"KE and PE 2gthr make up the total mech E of an object'
...i knw dat...bt
'it remains constant if thr r no external forces 2 wrk on the body anddddd "THE INTERNAL FORCES ARE CONSERVATIVE""also thr shld be no sudden changes in the motion of d body:rolleyes:

pleasezzz help me! i m jus nt been able 2 undrstand this...the tchr. who teaches us phy. seems to mug up the text n throw up in frnt of us...she is totally confused when i ask this...
please help me undrstnd this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction is an example of a non-conservative force... If you take a block of wood on a table and move it from position A to position B... the work done by friction depends on the path taken... do you go in a straight line... do you go in a curve... the work done by friction will be different depending on the path taken...

But for gravity the path doesn't matter... just the initial and final heights.

When you have a conservative force, you can have a "potential" energy... like gravitational potential energy... elastic potential energy... electric potential energy they make things easier because you don't have to deal with those forces... just energies...
 
Last edited:
You seem to have a number of problems- extreme difficulty in writing a coherent sentence, for one, inability to understand that the "tutorial section" is not for questions- most people do not go to the tutorial section to answer questions!

I'm moving this to the homework thread where I hope you will get more responses.
 
ok sry...i wasnt careful while posting...newayz..i needed an ans 2 my Q..
 
livelife92 said:
ther r sum sentences in ma textbk dat i ve neva been able 2 understand...:confused:
ther r sum sentences in ur Q dat i can't undestnd eidr, prhps u cld try puttin in sum vowels 4 exmpl n use sum commas r dots r sumthn

livelife92 said:
"a force is said to be conservative if wrk done by the force in a moving body depends only in the initial n final positions of the body during the motion"
does it mean dat a force is conservative if wrk depends on displacement?
No... or yes!
It depends on the initial and final position, so the total displacement. It does not depend on the path taken. For example, gravitational force is conservative, because if I lift an object straight up by 1 meter, or I move it all over the world, to the center of the Earth and finally hold it 1 meter higher than I started, in both cases the work done will be m g (assuming g to be constant). On the other hand, friction is non-conservative. If I move from A to B in a straight line, I will lose less energy in friction then when I move in a lot of tiny circles, for example.

livelife92 said:
"KE and PE 2gthr make up the total mech E of an object'
'it remains constant if thr r no external forces 2 wrk on the body anddddd "THE INTERNAL FORCES ARE CONSERVATIVE""
Yeah, so actually PE is just a bookkeeping tool that allows us to (ab)use conservation of energy when conservative forces are at work.
 
thx!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'

Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is（Figure 2）： F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

A and C collide with B inbetween; AB elastic, BC inelastic
Replies
27
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top