Understanding Coset Representation and its Role in Group Theory

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A coset representation exists in group theory, specifically denoted as "aH," where "a" is an element of group G and "H" is a subset of G. The coset representative is the element "a" in this notation. When H is not a normal subgroup, the uniqueness of the coset representative can lead to complications, as demonstrated in the example where H = {1, 2, 3, 4...} and 4 serves as the sole representative for the coset {4, 8, 12, 16...}. Discussions around coset representatives primarily pertain to calculations within quotient groups, which necessitate H being a normal subgroup.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically cosets and subgroup definitions.
  • Familiarity with normal subgroups and their significance in group theory.
  • Knowledge of quotient groups and their properties.
  • Basic mathematical notation and terminology used in abstract algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normal subgroups in group theory.
  • Learn about quotient groups and their applications in algebra.
  • Explore examples of coset calculations in various groups.
  • Investigate the implications of unique coset representatives in non-normal subgroups.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of group theory and its applications.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Is there a thing called a coset representation?

If so is it the element that factors outside the coset?

i.e. {4,8,12,16,...} = 4{1,2,3,4,...} so 4 is the coset representation for {4,8,12,16,...}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The standard way of representing a (left)coset is as "aH" where a is a member of group G and H is a subset of G. Is that what you are talking about?
 
I believe a coset representative would be the a in aH. Of course, talking about "coset representatives" when H isn't a normal subgroup is a little odd. For one, if H isn't a subgroup, the "representative" might be unique, and that's bad for most things you want to do with cosets (like in your example, if H = {1, 2, 3, 4...}, then 4 is a "coset representative" for {4, 8, 12, 16...}, but it's the only one, assuming the pattern continues as indicated). Also, you really only talk about coset representatives in terms of calculations in the quotient group, and that only makes sense if H is normal.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The standard way of representing a (left)coset is as "aH" where a is a member of group G and H is a subset of G. Is that what you are talking about?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K