Understanding De Broglie's Wave-Frequency Relationship

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter redtree
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    De broglie
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the de Broglie wave-frequency relationship, exploring its implications for particles and the equations that relate energy, momentum, frequency, and wavelength. Participants examine the validity of various equations and concepts within the context of both photons and particles with mass.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the wave-frequency relationship and de Broglie relations, questioning an apparent inconsistency in their application.
  • Another participant suggests an alternative interpretation of the equation, proposing that it could be expressed as v = v²/v.
  • Several participants clarify the de Broglie wavelength and its relation to the frequency of photons, emphasizing that these relationships apply to all particles, not just photons.
  • There is a correction regarding the total energy expression, with a participant asserting that total energy is mc², not mv².
  • A later reply discusses the implications of using a natural unit system where c=1, noting that this leads to a unitless velocity and suggesting that the solutions indicate movement at the speed of light.
  • Another participant identifies an error in the application of E = hf, stating that it is specific to photons and highlighting the need for clarity in defining quantities used in equations.
  • One participant introduces the concept of phase velocity and group velocity, arguing that the phase velocity of a de Broglie wave can exceed the speed of light, while emphasizing the importance of wave packets for localizability.
  • There is a mention that E = hf is also applicable to particles with mass, linking it to harmonic oscillators in quantum fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the de Broglie relations and the implications of using natural units. There is no consensus on the resolution of the initial question regarding the apparent inconsistency in the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining terms and conditions under which certain equations hold, particularly regarding the mass of particles and the context of wave-particle duality.

redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
The wave-frequency relationship is as follows:

f = v / [tex]\lambda[/tex]

Therefore:
v = [tex]\lambda[/tex] * f

The de Broglie relations are as follows:

[tex]\lambda[/tex] = h / p

f = E / h

Using some basic algebra:

v = (h / p) * (E / h)
v = E / p
v = [tex]\gamma[/tex]mc[tex]^{}2[/tex] / [tex]\gamma[/tex]mv
v = c[tex]^{}2[/tex] / v

Now, assuming a natural unit system with c=1

v = 1 / v

That doesn't seem to make sense. Where is my error?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure it isn't v=v^2/v
 
redtree said:
The de Broglie relations are as follows:

[tex]\lambda[/tex] = h / p

f = E / h
The first gives the de Broglie wavelength. The second relates the frequency of a photon to its energy.
 
Total energy is mc[tex]^{}2[/tex] not mv[tex]^{}2[/tex]
 
Doc Al said:
The first gives the de Broglie wavelength. The second relates the frequency of a photon to its energy.

The relationship is not just for a photon but for any particle. Frequency and wavelength are related by v = f * [tex]\lambda[/tex]
 
redtree said:
The relationship is not just for a photon but for any particle.
What relationship? Not E = hf.
Frequency and wavelength are related by v = f * [tex]\lambda[/tex]
This is yet a third relationship, true for any wave.
 
redtree said:
Now, assuming a natural unit system with c=1

v = 1 / v

That doesn't seem to make sense. Where is my error?

It "makes sense" because you have chosen to have velocity be unitless. The solutions to your equation are

v = +1 or v = -1

I.e., the object moves at the speed of light.

Somewhere, you must have used a relation that holds only for objects of zero rest mass. I should be more up on this stuff than I am, and will defer to Doc Al for just where the "error" is.
 
That's right. The error is in the equation E = hf, which is the famous Einstein relation for the energy of a photon.

More generally, the error is in writing down a string of equations without defining what any of the quantities refer to.
 
People, let's not get crazy and instead actually answer the fellow's question. What our friend has discovered is that the phase velocity of a deBroglie wave is indeed faster than the speed of light
[tex]v_p \frac{\omega}{k} = \frac{c^2}{v}[/tex]
Instead, he should consider particles as being represented by wave packets with some spread in momentum and energy (in order to be localizable). In this case, the relevant quantity is the group velocity
[tex]v_g = \frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k} = \frac{\partial E}{\partial p} = \frac{\partial (\sqrt{p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4} )}{ p }= \frac{p}{\gamma m} = v[/tex]
I hope this clears things up.

Edit: [tex]E = h f[/tex] is true for particles of mass as well. It's a result of harmonic oscillators in general, of which quantum fields are one type (in the limit where "particle" makes sense).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K