Chemistry Understanding derivation of Clausius-Clapeyron equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, starting from the Gibbs free energy difference between gas and liquid phases. It highlights that at dynamic equilibrium, the change in Gibbs free energy for vaporization is zero, leading to the relationship between vapor pressure and temperature. The terms for enthalpy and entropy of vaporization are noted to be constant for both temperatures in the derivation, despite being temperature-dependent, which is a common approximation in the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. The derivation involves equating the changes in Gibbs free energy for both phases and simplifying under the assumption of ideal gas behavior. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies how the Clapeyron equation simplifies to the Clausius-Clapeyron equation under specific conditions.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
For an ideal gas undergoing an infinitesimal process at constant ##T## we have

$$dG=VdP\tag{1}$$

$$G(P)-G^\circ=RT\ln{\left ( \frac{P}{P^\circ }\right )}\tag{2}$$
Relevant Equations
Next, consider ##\Delta G_{vap}##, the change in Gibbs free energy between gas and liquid phases of a substance at some constant pressure.
$$\Delta G_{vap}=G(g,P)-G(l,P)\tag{3}$$

$$=G^\circ+RT\ln{\left ( \frac{P}{P^\circ }\right )}-G(l,P)\tag{4}$$

The Gibbs free energy of a liquid is almost independent of pressure, so we use the approximation that ##G(l,P)\approx G(l,P^\circ)=G^\circ(l)##.

Then

$$\Delta G_{vap}=G^\circ-G(l,P)+RT\ln{\left ( \frac{P}{P^\circ }\right )}\tag{5}$$

$$=\Delta G^\circ_{vap}+RT\ln{\left ( \frac{P}{P^\circ }\right )}\tag{6}$$

At dynamic equilibrium between gas and liquid phases, we have ##\Delta G_{vap}=0##.

$$0=\Delta G^\circ_{vap}+RT\ln{\left ( \frac{P}{P^\circ }\right )}\tag{7}$$

$$\ln{\left ( \frac{P}{P^\circ }\right )}=-\frac{\Delta G^\circ_{vap}}{RT}=-\frac{\Delta H^\circ_{vap}-T\Delta S^\circ_{vap}}{RT}\tag{8}$$

In (8), ##P## is the vapor pressure at temperature ##T##.

If we write (8) out for two different temperatures we have

$$\ln{\left ( \frac{P_2}{P^\circ }\right )}=-\frac{\Delta H^\circ_{vap}-T_2\Delta S^\circ_{vap}}{RT_2}\tag{9a}$$

$$\ln{\left ( \frac{P_1}{P^\circ }\right )}=-\frac{\Delta H^\circ_{vap}-T_1\Delta S^\circ_{vap}}{RT_1}\tag{9b}$$

If we subtract one from the other we get the Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

What I don't quite understand here is why the terms ##\Delta H^\circ_{vap}## and ##\Delta S^\circ_{vap}## are the same in both (9a) and (9b).

In each of (9a) and (9b) these terms represent enthalpy and entropy of vaporization at standard pressure and, as far as I can tell, the temperature at which the vaporization is happening.

Aren't these terms dependent of temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are. CC equation in its 1/T1-1/T2 form is only an approximation.
 
The usual way of deriving the CC equation is to recognize that, along the equilibrium line, the change in Gibbs free energy between saturated vapor and the saturated liquid is zero. So, if there is a temperature change and equilibrium is maintained, $$dG_{liq}-dG_{vap}=0$$Now, for the liquid, we have $$dG_{liq}=-S_{liq}dT+V_{liq}dP$$and, for the vapor we have $$dG_{vap}=-S_{vap}dT+V_{vap}dP$$So we have $$-S_{vap}dT+V_{vap}dP=-S_{liq}dT+V_{liq}dP$$or $$-(S_{vap}-S_{liq})dT+(V_{vap}-V_{liq})dP=0$$or$$\frac{dP}{dT}=\frac{(S_{vap}-S_{liq})}{(V_{vap}-V_{liq})}$$But, at any one temperature along the equilibrium line, we have $$G_{vap}-G_{liq}=(H_{vap}-H_{liq})-T(S_{vap}-S_{liq})=0$$So, combining the previous two equations, we have, $$\frac{dP}{dT}=\frac{(H_{vap}-H_{liq})}{T(V_{vap}-V_{liq})}$$For the case of an ideal vapor far below the critical temperature, we have $$V_{vap}=\frac{RT}{P}>>V_{liq}$$Under this approximation, the Clapeyron equation reduces to the CC equation: $$\frac{d\ln{P}}{dT}=\frac{(H_{vap}-H_{liq})}{RT^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes zenterix and Mayhem
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Back
Top