Understanding Division in Index Notation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the use of division in index notation, specifically addressing the expressions a = 1/b_i and a_i = b_i/c_{jj}. It establishes that a = 1/b_i is nonsensical due to the absence of a repeated index, while a_i = b_i/c_{jj} is valid and can be expressed as a summation over j. The key takeaway is that free indices must remain free on both sides of an equation, and division involving vector quantities is infrequent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of index notation in mathematics
  • Familiarity with vector quantities and their properties
  • Knowledge of summation notation and its implications
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules of index notation in linear algebra
  • Explore vector calculus and its applications
  • Learn about tensor notation and its significance in physics
  • Review examples of summation and free indices in mathematical expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra or tensor calculus who seek to deepen their understanding of index notation and its applications in equations.

sinad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

Recently I started to use index notation, but still the division is not clear for me. I'll mention just some simple examples that I'm not sure about:

Does a =\frac{1}{b_i} mean that a = \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{1}{b_i} or a = 1 / \sum_{i = 1}^{3}b_i ?

Similarly, does a_i =\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}} mean that a_i = \sum_{j=1}^{3}\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}} or a = b_i / \sum_{j = 1}^{3}c_{jj} ?

thanks beforehand!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, a = 1/b_i is a nonsensical expression.

a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj} is fine, however. Divisions don't come up very often with vector quantities, though.
 
Muphrid said:
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, a = 1/b_i is a nonsensical expression.

Indeed, I'm sorry, what I wanted to write is a = 1/b_{ii}

Muphrid said:
a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj} is fine

thanks! it is clear now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
956
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K