Understanding Eq (4.19) of Peskin-Schroeder

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter praharmitra
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
praharmitra
Messages
308
Reaction score
1
Can someone explain to me how the authors got the second equation of eq (4.19), Page 84, of Peskin Schroeder.

The equation is:

[tex] H_I(t) = e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}(H_{\text{int}}) e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} = \int d^3x \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi_I(t,\textbf{x})^4[/tex]
where
[tex] H_{\text{int}} = \int d^3x \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^4(\textbf{x})[/tex]
I do not understand how the second part of this eq is equal to the third. Please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since [itex]e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} = 1[/itex], you can insert it between each factor of [itex]\phi[/itex]:

[tex] e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi^4 e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)}<br /> = \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> =\phi_I^4[/tex]
 


matonski said:
Since [itex]e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} = 1[/itex], you can insert it between each factor of [itex]\phi[/itex]:

[tex] e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi^4 e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \\<br /> = \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right]<br /> \left[ e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)} \right] \\<br /> =\phi_I^4[/tex]

Of course that would be the natural thing to do. However, [tex]e^{iH_0(t-t_0)}\phi e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)}[/tex] is a vague statement since you have not examined the arguments of [tex]\phi[/tex].

In our current context of [tex]H_{int}[/tex], the argument is [tex]\phi(\textbf{x})[/tex]. However, the definition of [tex]\phi_I[/tex] is

[tex] \phi_I(t,\textbf{x}) = e^{iH_0(t-t_0)} \phi(t_0,\textbf{x}) e^{-iH_0(t-t_0)}[/tex]
where [tex]\phi(t_0,\textbf{x}) = e^{iHt_0}\phi(\textbf{x})e^{-iHt_0}[/tex]. This surely does not reproduce the same result that has been written.

What am I doing wrong?
 


[tex]\phi(t_0,\mathbf{x}) = \phi(\mathbf{x})[/tex].

Schroedinger picture operators are defined at some reference time [tex]t_0[/tex].