Understanding Gauss' Law: Electric Field of an Infinite Slab of Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Gauss' Law to determine the electric field of an infinite slab of charge with a specified charge density. Participants are exploring the implications of the charge distribution and the geometry involved in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss' Law, questioning the correct interpretation of charge density and the geometry of the Gaussian surface. There are attempts to relate the electric field to the enclosed charge and confusion about the differences between an infinite slab and an infinite sheet.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and clarifications regarding the application of Gauss' Law. Some participants express confusion about the setup and calculations, while others offer guidance on interpreting the charge density and the geometry of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints related to the charge density and the limits of integration, as well as the distinction between surface charge density and volume charge density. Participants are navigating through these concepts to arrive at a clearer understanding.

mewmew
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
For this problem I am giving the following:

An infinite slab of charge parallel to the yz plane whose density is given by:

p(x)= t, -b<x<b;
0, |x|>b;

Where t and b are constants.

And I am to find the electric field.

I am pretty confused on how to do this problem. I know that the electric field is in the x direction, and that is also where the normal to the surface is directed. So I thought it would be:

2 v E =\frac{q}{\epsilon} where the q = \frac{p}{v}

Where v is the volume, similar to how you do an infinite sheet but I don't get the right answer. But then q would be 0 for outside of b and that is not right so I guess my method is completely wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The big deal about Gauss is that the E-field piercing the surface
is written in terms of the charge enclosed.

A cylinder that cuts all the way through the slab encloses
the same amount of charge as it would if the Q were just a thin sheet.
So the E-field that pierces the end caps is the same as for a thin sheet...
I would write this as E dot A = (4 pi k) Q_enclosed , using k = 1/(4pi epsilon)
Q enclosed = rho * volume ... = t * (A h) ... what volume contains charge?

This isn't true for the interior of the slab, because the endcap's Area is the same,
but the cylinder encloses less charge.
 
Thanks, but I think I need to do it a different way. We are using Gauss' law in its basic form of \int\int_s E . n ds=\frac{q}{\epsilon} I guess I am confused because for a infinite thin sheet you get \frac{\sigma}{2 \epsilon} and it would seem outside of the slab this is what the field would be, but it isn't, it is \frac{\rho b}{\epsilon}

By looking on another website I think to have found it, I did the following integral:

\int_b^b \rho dx which seems to give me the right answer but I don't really understand it. The bottom limit is -b but I couldn't get latex to do it right
 
Last edited:
the integral of the charge density IS the enclosed charge.
sigma is SURFACE charge density, which is rho * thickness.

If you think that your equation for Gauss is different from mine,
maybe you don't recognize an Area when they write it as ds instead of dA.

How much charge is enclosed by a cylinder that extends from -b to +b?
What's hard to understand?
 
Ya, I figured it out it just took me a while to remember all the stuff I learned last year. It wasn't that I thought what you had wasn't Gauss' law, I just wasn't sure how to put it into the form I needed. Thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K