Understanding Gravity: Force or Space Warp?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vbalbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of gravity, specifically whether it should be understood as a force or as a result of the curvature of space, as described by Einstein's theory of general relativity. Participants explore theoretical implications, experimental challenges, and the relationship between gravity and quantum theory.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether gravity is a force or a curvature effect, noting the difficulty in determining this experimentally.
  • One participant highlights that general relativity provides a geometric explanation for gravity, which is currently the most accurate theory available.
  • There is mention of the possibility of future theories involving gravitons as force carriers, but no current quantum gravity theory matches the predictive power of general relativity.
  • Another participant points out that while space behaves as if it is curved according to general relativity, it remains unclear whether this curvature is an actual property or a result of other conditions.
  • Some participants acknowledge the predictive success of gravity's effects while questioning the underlying reasons for gravity and mass, leading to further speculation about the Higgs field and its relationship to spacetime curvature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that gravity is poorly understood compared to other fundamental forces, and multiple competing views about its nature remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations in current understanding, including the unresolved relationship between gravity and quantum theory, as well as the dependence on definitions of mass and curvature.

vbalbert
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
There's no such thing as gravity, the Earth sucks!

For some reason I've been seeing a rather large number of media presentations (TV, magazines) regarding The Theory of Everything. This usually launches into a discussion about how physicists have not been able to reconcile gravity with quantum theory.

Invariably, they bring up Einstein's theory of gravity; i.e. that a mass warps space and draws in other masses due to the curve of space. This idea of gravity has made me wonder if gravity is truly a force or is just the manifestation of how space is warped. For Newton, gravity was an attractive force between two bodies. For Einstein it was because things tend to move towards warps in space.

Gravity is one of the four fundamental forces in the universe. However, we have not been able to manipulate it or even directly observe it like we have with the other three forces; electro-magnetism, strong and weak. We can even manipulate those forces with a great degree of success, sometimes in spectacular ways. But we can't do this with gravity. I'm no physicist, but I've never even heard of any ideas of how this can be done. We're still trying to find ways to detect some of the predicted properties of gravity, most notably gravity waves.

So is it a force or merely the byproduct of how space is shaped?

Please be gentle with me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I think nobody knows if it is a force or a curvature effect.
How would we even begin to determine that experimentally! :smile:

The general theory of relativity uses a geometric explanation for gravity and currently it is by far the best and most accurate theory we have concerning gravity.

It might be that in the future someone will develop a competing theory using gravitational force carriers called gravitons which work in the realm of QFT.
But so far no quantum gravity theory is even close to the predictive value of general relativity theory.
 
So you're saying that everybody else is as confused as me?
 
Pretty much, yes. Gravity is certainly the least well understood of the four forces.

- Warren
 
But we do know that space seems to behave as if it's curved according to the general theory of relativity. That's why the curved-space view gets airtime, even though the gtr isn't completely in agreement with all our other physics.

Even if space always behaved exactly as if it were curved, we still couldn't tell whether it's actually curved or whether there exists some other condition that has the same effect.
 
Last edited:
hehe:biggrin:
Gravity is one of those things that were are able to predict its movements/results almost on the dot but many people have conflicting theories. In reality we may never know the true thing that causes gravity. You could say that gravity is caused by mass, but why is it caused by mass??:confused: You could say that mass itself curves space but why does mass curve space?:confused:
 
I thought mass is caused by the Higgs field?
Then the Higgs fields warp spacetime.
Or the Higgs fields is merely a curvature of spacetime?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K