Understanding Joint Probability with No-Replacement Rule

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sauravrt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joint Probability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on understanding joint probability, particularly in the context of events occurring without replacement. Participants explore how the order of events affects joint and conditional probabilities, using examples involving colored balls to illustrate their points.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Saurav questions whether the order of events A and B affects their joint probability P(A.B).
  • EnumaElish suggests that while order is generally not a concern, certain cases, such as events defined by accumulation thresholds, may imply a temporal ordering.
  • Saurav presents a scenario involving drawing balls without replacement and asks if the order matters for conditional probability P(R|B) and joint probability P(RB).
  • Another participant confirms that in a no-replacement scenario, the order of draws does matter, but this can be reconciled with the definition of joint probability if events are defined appropriately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the order of events can matter in specific contexts, particularly when dealing with no-replacement scenarios. However, there is no consensus on the implications of this for joint probability definitions across all cases.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions of events and probabilities must account for the no-replacement rule, which may affect how joint probabilities are calculated.

sauravrt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If A and B are two events and I want to look at their joint probability P(A.B) do I have to be concerned with the order in with A and B occur?

Saurav
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, in general. However, consider:

A = {accumulation > x}

B = {accumulation < x}.

In this case, there is a natural temporal ordering of the events A and B; B almost certainly occurs before A.
 
Thanks EnumaElish

So now if I am looking at a problem where I have 3 red balls and 4 blue balls and if I pickup two balls want to find the probability P(R|B) (i.e prob of picking Red ball given Blue ball was already picked). In this conditional probability case, the order in which the balls were picked is important, am i correct? However the joint probability P(RB) = P(R|B).P(B) = P(B|R).P(R) is not concerned with the order in which the balls were picked?

Saurav
 
You are correct that as long as you are not replacing each draw (by putting a drawn ball back into the bin), the order of draws will matter. This does not have to conflict with the definition of joint probability using conditional probabilities as long as you define each event by taking the no-replacement rule into account. So if you define P(R|B) as the probability of drawing a red having drawn a blue, then P(RB) will be defined accordingly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K