Understanding Limits of Integration: Cartesian or Polar First?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tolove
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limits of integration in double integrals, specifically comparing Cartesian and polar coordinates. Participants explore how to correctly set limits when switching between these coordinate systems and the implications for the regions defined by these limits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about integrating limits and whether switching the order of integration affects the outcome.
  • Another participant suggests that finding the correct limits involves drawing the region and ensuring that the new limits correspond to the same area.
  • There is a discussion about the arbitrary assignment of variables x and y in the limits of integration.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of visualizing regions when the function is not easily recognizable.
  • Participants mention the importance of understanding the limits of integration, especially when transitioning between Cartesian and polar coordinates.
  • One participant notes that algebraic inequalities can represent the limits without needing to graph the function itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of correctly identifying limits of integration and the relationship between Cartesian and polar coordinates. However, there is no consensus on the best approach to visualize or determine these limits, as some express difficulty in recognizing functions and drawing regions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for a good understanding of Jacobians and the potential for traps in integration limits, indicating that certain assumptions may not be universally applicable.

tolove
Messages
164
Reaction score
1
I'm confused with limits of integrating and which to integrate first,

I've been getting by so far with just knowing the following,
[itex]\int_0^1\int_0^y f(x,y) dxdy = \int_0^1\int_0^{rsin\theta} f(rcos\theta,rsin\theta) rdrd\theta[/itex]

But what happens when we switch it around?
[itex]\int_0^1\int_0^{x} f(x) dydx = ...?[/itex]

Will it still be the same? That is,
[itex]= \int_0^1\int_0^{rcos\theta} f(rcos\theta,rsin\theta) rdrd\theta[/itex]

Thank you for your time!

edit: I suppose it would be, since the assignment of the particular characters x and y are arbitrary. I'm still confused since I'm not showing it explicitly. I need to review Jacobians I suppose, very short on time this weekend though.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi tolove! :smile:
tolove said:
[itex]\int_0^1\int_0^y f(x,y) dxdy = \int_0^1\int_0^{rsin\theta} f(rcos\theta,rsin\theta) rdrd\theta[/itex]

But what happens when we switch it around?
[itex]\int_0^1\int_0^{x} f(x) dydx = ...?[/itex]

the limits and the jacobian are two separate matters

finding the correct limits is simply a question of drawing the region, and making sure the new limits give the same region

your first limits were for 0 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ 1

your second limits are for 0 ≤ y ≤ x ≤ 1 …

so how should you change them to get the same region? :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
tiny-tim said:
hi tolove! :smile:


the limits and the jacobian are two separate matters

finding the correct limits is simply a question of drawing the region, and making sure the new limits give the same region

your first limits were for 0 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ 1

your second limits are for 0 ≤ y ≤ x ≤ 1 …

so how should you change them to get the same region? :wink:

What if it's too complicated to draw by hand, or I'm unable to recognize the function?
 
not going to happen …

it'll always be f(y) ≤ x ≤ g(y) and a ≤ y ≤ b :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
tiny-tim said:
not going to happen …

it'll always be f(y) ≤ x ≤ g(y) and a ≤ y ≤ b :wink:

I'm unable to recognize the function rather often. For example,

[itex]\int_0^1 \int_0^{\sqrt{(1-x^2)}} e^{-x^2-y^2} dydx[/itex]
 
tolove said:
I'm unable to recognize the function rather often. For example,

[itex]\int_0^1 \int_0^{\sqrt{(1-x^2)}} e^{-x^2-y^2} dydx[/itex]

ok, that's 0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x2) ≤ 1

ie 0 ≤ y2 ≤ 1 - x2 ≤ 1,

which becomes … ? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
tiny-tim said:
ok, that's 0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x2) ≤ 1

ie 0 ≤ y2 ≤ 1 - x2 ≤ 1,

which becomes … ? :smile:

Alright, I got it! Thank you very much! There wasn't any graphing involved in this, though? It's all shown algebraically with those neat little inequalities. I suppose there are cases where traps are present, however.

r = 0..1, theta=0..Pi/2

Edit: Ahh! When you say graph, you mean the limits, not the actual function being integrated?
 
Last edited:
tolove said:
Alright, I got it! Thank you very much! There wasn't any graphing involved in this, though? It's all shown algebraically with those neat little inequalities. I suppose there are cases where traps are present, however.

r = 0..1, theta=0..Pi/2

Edit: Ahh! When you say graph, you mean the limits, not the actual function being integrated?
Yes, the limits of integration. They define the region over which integration is to take place. It's very important to have a good understanding of what this region looks like, especially if you're changing from Cartesian to polar or vice-versa.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K