Is there an algebraic derivation of the area element in polar coordinates?

In summary: The derivation is to compute dx \wedge dy in terms of da \wedge db, for which purpose dx must be expressed as dx = f_a\,da + f_b\,db and similarly for dy.Alternatively the OP could start from dx\,dy = \left \| \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial a} \times\frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial b}\right\| da\,db.In any event, I'm not sure how the OP is supposed to get from dx = f_a\,da and dy = f_b\,db to dx\,dy = |f_a g_b - f
  • #1
SamRoss
Gold Member
254
36
TL;DR Summary
There is a simple geometric derivation of the area element in polar coordinates. Is there an algebraic derivation as well?
There is a simple geometric derivation of the area element ## r dr d\theta## in polar coordinates such as in the following link: http://citadel.sjfc.edu/faculty/kgreen/vector/Block3/jacob/node4.html

Is there an algebraic derivation as well beginning with Cartesian coordinates and using ## x=rcos\theta## and ## y=rsin\theta ## to transform the Cartesian area element ##dx dy##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
SamRoss said:
There is a simple geometric derivation of the area element ## r dr d\theta## in polar coordinates such as in the following link: http://citadel.sjfc.edu/faculty/kgreen/vector/Block3/jacob/node4.html

Is there an algebraic derivation as well beginning with Cartesian coordinates and using ## x=rcos\theta## and ## y=rsin\theta ## to transform the Cartesian area element ##dx dy##?
I am not sure what you mean by algebraic derivation, this is usually called a change of coordinates. In this case, between polars and Cartesian.
 
  • #3
WWGD said:
I am not sure what you mean by algebraic derivation, this is usually called a change of coordinates. In this case, between polars and Cartesian.

Yes, that is what I'm looking for.
 
  • #4
The setup ( generalized to n variables) is usually of the sort:
##x=f(a,b),\text{ so }
dx=f_a(a,b)da##
##y=g(a,b)\text , \text{ so } dy=f_b(a,b)db##
Where ##f_a, f_b ## are the partials with respect to ##a,b ##. In this case we use ##x=rcos\theta##, etc.

Is that helpful?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
WWGD said:
The setup ( generalized to n variables) is usually of the sort:
##x=f(a,b),\text{ so }
dx=f_a(a,b)da##
##y=g(a,b)\text , \text{ so } dy=f_b(a,b)db##
Where ##f_a, f_b ## are the partials with respect to ##a,b ##. In this case we use ##x=rcos\theta##, etc.

Is that helpful?

[tex]
dx = f_a(a,b)\,da + f_b(a,b)\,db[/tex] etc...

EDIT: Just expanding dx and dy in the new coordinates and multiplying those expressions will not yield the correct answer; instead you must calculate the exterior product [itex]dx \wedge dy[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Cryo
  • #6
pasmith said:
[tex]
dx = f_a(a,b)\,da + f_b(a,b)\,db[/tex] etc...

EDIT: Just expanding dx and dy in the new coordinates and multiplying those expressions will not yield the correct answer; instead you must calculate the exterior product [itex]dx \wedge dy[/itex].
OP is about change of coordinates, not about finding the total derivative.
 
  • #7
WWGD said:
OP is about change of coordinates, not about finding the total derivative.

The OP wants an algebraic derivation of the expression for the area element, and the relvant algebra is that of 2-forms. The derivation is then to compute [itex]dx \wedge dy[/itex] in terms of [itex]da \wedge db[/itex], for which purpose [itex]dx[/itex] must be expressed as [itex]dx = f_a\,da + f_b\,db[/itex] and similarly for [itex]dy[/itex].

Alternatively the OP could start from [tex]dx\,dy = \left \| \frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial a} \times
\frac{\partial \mathbf{r}}{\partial b}\right\| da\,db.[/tex]

In any event, I'm not sure how the OP is supposed to get from [itex]dx = f_a\,da[/itex] and [itex]dy = f_b\,db[/itex] to [itex]dx\,dy = |f_a g_b - f_b g_a|da\,db[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #8
I referred specifically to the change of coordinates, not to the area element. You expect an answer for a question I did not address. I take things step by step, and start with a change of coordinates. As stated, this is correct. Yes, you did complete the needed steps; I was doing it more gradually.Edit. But, yes, this is correct, the new area is scaled by the norm of the determinant of the change of variables.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
So, yes, to clarify, what pasmith says is correct. The change of area element is given by dadb=dxdy|J(x,y)| , where J(x,y) is the Jacobian of the change of variables matrix.
 
  • #10
##x=r\cos\theta, y=r\sin\theta \rightarrow dx=\cos \theta dr + -r\sin\theta d\theta, dy=\sin\theta dr + r\cos\theta d\theta##

thus, ##dx \wedge dy = \cos \theta dr + -r\sin\theta d\theta \wedge sin\theta dr + r\cos\theta d\theta \rightarrow \cos \theta dr \wedge sin\theta dr + \cos \theta dr \wedge r\cos\theta d\theta + -r\sin\theta d\theta \wedge \sin\theta dr + -r\sin\theta d\theta \wedge r\cos\theta d\theta \rightarrow r \cos^2 \theta dr \wedge d\theta + -r \sin^2 \theta d\theta \wedge dr \rightarrow r \cos^2 \theta dr \wedge d\theta + r \sin^2 \theta dr \wedge d\theta ##

Which finally gives us: ## (\cos^2 \theta + \sin^2 \theta) r dr\wedge d\theta \rightarrow r dr\wedge d\theta \rightarrow r drd\theta ##

You may wonder why some terms went to zero and how i can switch the signs, and that would be due to some properties of exterior derivatives (and wedge products), which i suggest you look into. Hopefully this is what you were looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #11
I believed s/he wanted to go through it gradually , so I first went over the change of variables, but I guess we have to wait and see if they come back and tell us what they wanted.
 
  • #12
Hi everybody. Thanks for all the help and sorry it took me so long to reply back. I had attempted the problem using a change of coordinates and was unable to get it to work. Thank you WWGD for bringing up the Jacobian. I had not thought to use that. Thank you Pasmith for bringing up the exterior product. That is a concept I was unfamiliar with and I will be sure to read up on it. And thank you Romsofia for the full solution. I appreciate everyone's assistance with this.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD

1. What is the formula for the area element in polar coordinates?

The formula for the area element in polar coordinates is dA = r dr dθ, where r is the distance from the origin and θ is the angle from the positive x-axis.

2. How is the area element derived in polar coordinates?

The area element in polar coordinates can be derived by considering a small sector of a circle with radius r and angle dθ. The area of this sector is given by (1/2) r^2 dθ. As the sector becomes smaller, it approaches the area element dA. Thus, dA = (1/2) r^2 dθ.

3. What is the significance of the area element in polar coordinates?

The area element in polar coordinates is used to calculate the area of irregular shapes or regions that cannot be easily expressed in terms of Cartesian coordinates. It is also useful in solving problems in physics and engineering, such as calculating the moment of inertia or the center of mass of an object.

4. Can the formula for the area element in polar coordinates be extended to higher dimensions?

Yes, the formula for the area element in polar coordinates can be extended to higher dimensions. In three dimensions, it becomes dV = r^2 sin θ dr dθ dz, where r is the distance from the origin, θ is the angle from the positive x-axis, and z is the height. This formula can be further extended to higher dimensions by adding more variables.

5. Are there any limitations to using the area element in polar coordinates?

While the area element in polar coordinates is a useful tool, it has limitations when dealing with certain shapes or regions. For example, it may be difficult to use in cases where the boundaries of the region are not defined by simple equations. In these cases, it may be necessary to use other methods, such as numerical integration, to calculate the area.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
157
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
9
Views
354
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top