Understanding Maxwell's Equations: Translating and Simplifying with Visual Aids

[jumpjack]

I need some help figuring out if this document is correct:
http://spazio.110mb.com/maxwell.pdf

I tried to translate it into english but is far too complex for my english, so I tried to summarize it with a couple of images:
http://spazio.110mb.com/immagini/maxwell.html

I'd like to know the unit of measure of the resulting X, and how I could possible verify the new X equation by building that magnet; the author suggests a 6 meters radius magnet but it's quite big, and I'd like to figure out if I could build a smaller (and cheaper!) one , even just capable of "bringing up" a few grams of matter, which would be far enough!

 

[jumpjack]

None?

 

[jumpjack]

can't understand such a behaviour.

 

[HallsofIvy]

"E", "D", "B", and "H" are familiar but without knowing what "R" and "X" are supposed to represent, it is impossible to say anything about this. Was this actually published in a Journal or just someone unedited thoughts?

 

[jumpjack]

Eugene Podkletnov published in 1992 a research which, as far as I can understand from some numbers and descriptions (10^6 Hz current into a toroid), appears to be studying same effect Sabato Scala found in his equations:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/39625078/Eugene-Podkletnov-Physica-C-1992

The "Podkletnov effect" discovert caused a lot of researches to start; looks like the biggest difficulty is how to detect gravitomagnetics effects, due to their very very VERY low amplitude w.r.t. electromagnetic effects, but it appears quite sure that such an effect does exist.

Podkletnov used liquid helium and superonductors to produce gravity modificartions; havinbg no access to such resources, I wonder if I could find another way to get same results, starting from equation for X and "playing" with different values for its terms.

I think biggest obstacle is repredented by magnetic permeability, which must be very high (over 100.000) to see the effect using low frequencies and/or low currents.

Maybe magnetic permeability raises in cooled superconductors?!?

 

[jumpjack]

Additional links:
http://scholar.google.it/scholar?hl...-x+Superconductor+Below+70¡K+under+E.M.+Field

I wonder if toroid rotation fits in Scala's equations for R and X.

I think this sentence is the link:

"It is well known that a rotating superconductor produces a magnetic field
proportional to its angular velocity."

(from http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0603/0603033.pdf )

Indeed Scala says the gravitational force is created by rotating magnetic field.

 

[ZapperZ]

Eugene Podkletnov published in 1992 a research which, as far as I can understand from some numbers and descriptions (10^6 Hz current into a toroid), appears to be studying same effect Sabato Scala found in his equations:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/39625078/Eugene-Podkletnov-Physica-C-1992

The "Podkletnov effect" discovert caused a lot of researches to start; looks like the biggest difficulty is how to detect gravitomagnetics effects, due to their very very VERY low amplitude w.r.t. electromagnetic effects, but it appears quite sure that such an effect does exist.

Podkletnov used liquid helium and superonductors to produce gravity modificartions; havinbg no access to such resources, I wonder if I could find another way to get same results, starting from equation for X and "playing" with different values for its terms.

I think biggest obstacle is repredented by magnetic permeability, which must be very high (over 100.000) to see the effect using low frequencies and/or low currents.

Maybe magnetic permeability raises in cooled superconductors?!?

Er.. no. Please look at the HISTORY of the podkletnov effect and why this has not been verified.

This discussion is closed.

Zz.