Understanding Moment Vectors and Positive Rotation Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldfish9776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Rotation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the concept of moment vectors and their relationship with force directions in mechanics. It establishes that a counterclockwise (CCW) moment about the z-axis is considered positive, while negative forces can still produce positive moments when multiplied by negative distances. The confusion arises from the interpretation of force vectors and their magnitudes, which can be negative when acting in the negative direction. The conversation emphasizes that moment vectors, not force vectors, dictate rotation direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment vectors and their calculations
  • Familiarity with force vectors and their directions
  • Basic knowledge of rotational mechanics
  • Concept of positive and negative values in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rotational dynamics in physics
  • Learn about the right-hand rule for determining moment direction
  • Explore the relationship between force, distance, and moment calculation
  • Investigate the effects of negative forces on moment vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone studying rotational dynamics and moment vector analysis.

goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Assuming positive x direction is counterclockwise, then why would the force 50n and 40n are turned clockwise ? (they have negative value)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150915_100115.jpg
    IMG_20150915_100115.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 557
Physics news on Phys.org
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


Assuming positive x direction is counterclockwise, then why would the force 50n and 40n are turned clockwise ? (they have negative value)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

It's not that the positive x direction is necessarily CCW, it's that a CCW moment about the z-axis is assumed to be positive.

A positive (CCW) moment could be the result of a positive force multiplied by a positive distance from the axis of rotation or a negative force multiplied by a negative distance from the axis of rotation.

These force magnitudes are negative because the force vectors are acting in the negative direction.

Just like the positive moment direction is assumed to be CCW, positive forces are assumed to act in the positive x or y directions.
 
SteamKing said:
These force magnitudes are negative because the force vectors are acting in the negative direction.
One quibble: a magnitude is by definition non-negative. Vector components?
 
haruspex said:
One quibble: a magnitude is by definition non-negative. Vector components?
That's a fair description.
 
SteamKing said:
It's not that the positive x direction is necessarily CCW, it's that a CCW moment about the z-axis is assumed to be positive.

A positive (CCW) moment could be the result of a positive force multiplied by a positive distance from the axis of rotation or a negative force multiplied by a negative distance from the axis of rotation.

These force magnitudes are negative because the force vectors are acting in the negative direction.

Just like the positive moment direction is assumed to be CCW, positive forces are assumed to act in the positive x or y directions.
ok, i understood that when the force 50n fall on 2m(50x2) ( the resultant force vector is in positive k direction , come out of the page . ) . If I do it in the form of 2 X 50 , then it would be in negative k direction , am i right ? can i do in this way ?
 
Last edited:
goldfish9776 said:
ok, i understood that when the force 50n fall on 2m(50x2) ( the resultant force vector is in positive k direction , come out of the page . ) . If I do it in the form of 2 X 50 , then it would be in negative k direction , am i right ? can i do in this way ?
It's not a force vector you are calculating here: it's a moment vector. Moment vectors result in rotation either clockwise or counter-clockwise w.r.t. a given axis, and one direction, either CW or CCW, is assumed to be positive. In the example problem from the OP, you are told that positive moments are assumed to be CCW w.r.t. the z-axis coming out of the paper, which also implies that positive forces are in the directions of the x and y axes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: goldfish9776

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K