Understanding Moment Vectors and Positive Rotation Direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldfish9776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Rotation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Assuming positive x direction is counterclockwise, then why would the force 50n and 40n are turned clockwise ? (they have negative value)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150915_100115.jpg
    IMG_20150915_100115.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 577
Physics news on Phys.org
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


Assuming positive x direction is counterclockwise, then why would the force 50n and 40n are turned clockwise ? (they have negative value)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

It's not that the positive x direction is necessarily CCW, it's that a CCW moment about the z-axis is assumed to be positive.

A positive (CCW) moment could be the result of a positive force multiplied by a positive distance from the axis of rotation or a negative force multiplied by a negative distance from the axis of rotation.

These force magnitudes are negative because the force vectors are acting in the negative direction.

Just like the positive moment direction is assumed to be CCW, positive forces are assumed to act in the positive x or y directions.
 
SteamKing said:
These force magnitudes are negative because the force vectors are acting in the negative direction.
One quibble: a magnitude is by definition non-negative. Vector components?
 
haruspex said:
One quibble: a magnitude is by definition non-negative. Vector components?
That's a fair description.
 
SteamKing said:
It's not that the positive x direction is necessarily CCW, it's that a CCW moment about the z-axis is assumed to be positive.

A positive (CCW) moment could be the result of a positive force multiplied by a positive distance from the axis of rotation or a negative force multiplied by a negative distance from the axis of rotation.

These force magnitudes are negative because the force vectors are acting in the negative direction.

Just like the positive moment direction is assumed to be CCW, positive forces are assumed to act in the positive x or y directions.
ok, i understood that when the force 50n fall on 2m(50x2) ( the resultant force vector is in positive k direction , come out of the page . ) . If I do it in the form of 2 X 50 , then it would be in negative k direction , am i right ? can i do in this way ?
 
Last edited:
goldfish9776 said:
ok, i understood that when the force 50n fall on 2m(50x2) ( the resultant force vector is in positive k direction , come out of the page . ) . If I do it in the form of 2 X 50 , then it would be in negative k direction , am i right ? can i do in this way ?
It's not a force vector you are calculating here: it's a moment vector. Moment vectors result in rotation either clockwise or counter-clockwise w.r.t. a given axis, and one direction, either CW or CCW, is assumed to be positive. In the example problem from the OP, you are told that positive moments are assumed to be CCW w.r.t. the z-axis coming out of the paper, which also implies that positive forces are in the directions of the x and y axes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: goldfish9776